MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W789789608

The Secret Life of Greed

2014· article· en· W789789608 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueAnglican Theological Review · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueGlobal Financial Regulation and Crises
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSurpriseEconomic miracleGreat DepressionFinancial crisisMiracleEconomicsLawPolitical scienceSociologyPoliticsKeynesian economics
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: A Culture of Greed?Greed was widely and unambiguously identified by many experts as one of the chief culprits behind the catastrophic financial crisis of 2008. This explanation gained public notoriety in view of investigations into Goldman Sachs's shell game, which contributed to the bursting of the U.S. housing bubble, the near collapse of major business sectors such as the auto industry, and the evaporated personal life-savings of thousands of Americans. It was coupled with news reports of top financial executives who had multiplied their salaries and bonuses like some dark version of the miracle of the loaves and fishes, while employees in the same firms lost their jobs and, in some cases, all their retirement savings. Looking for an explanation in the immediate wake of the crisis, seemed to say it best.1This verdict should come as little surprise. On July 16, 2002, a number of years prior to those precipitous months that brought the world economy to the brink of a second Depression, Alan Greenspan, Chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve (1987-2006), told the Senate Banking Committee that by the late 1990s the American corporate culture had become corrupt as regulatory mechanisms were overwhelmed by the proliferation of avenues to express greed [that] had grown so enormously.* 2 June of 2012 the Chancellor of the Exchequer publically stated that in the years 2005, 2006, and early 2007, [there was] evidence of systematic greed at the expense of financial integrity and stability and that the mischief of key players in Londons financial sector had elevated greed above all other concerns and brought our economy to its knees.3 May of 2013, Mark Carney, the Governor of the Bank of Canada, publicly criticized the international banking community for failing to safeguard society's economic machinery from the personal voracity of its entrusted administrators: These abuses have reinforced questions about the fundamental values of people in the system.4 The commentaries are all the more compelling for three reasons: first, they bracket the crisis by a significant time-span; second, the nature of such admissions would not be offered lightly, coming as they did from the highest levels of government; and third, despite different national economic interests they still converge on this same point. Together, these indicate that the greed narrative is not a flash in the pan.No amount of moral reprimand or legal barrier is able to extinguish this kind of brash, deep, insatiable, and ultimately mysterious desire for money and possessions, along with the allied aphrodisiac of power. Regulations be damned: In the end virtue can't be regulated, states Carney. Ultimately it's a question of personal responsibility.5 Like water running downhill, greed always finds a way unless this proclivity is relegated to a system that extinguishes all individual economic entrepreneurialism. But the twentieth-century experiments of social engineering in communism and socialism ended disastrously by crushing individual dignity and emasculating personal initiative.What is greed? contrast to its more elegant synonyms avarice, cupidity, and covetousness, this word implies an extra measure of depravity. The synonyms are suited for polite conversation; greed is the street moniker for when the grittier reality hits home. But fundamentally it means to crave after something that is in no way necessary for life sustenance; Aquinas described it as an immoderate love of possessing.6 The object of greed need not only be money or a thing, which are its more familiar incarnations. It is the artist who even after becoming well-established never feels sufficiently recognized; it is the hockey parent whose son or daughter never scores enough goals; it is the teenager who at all costs must have the latest online game. It is in the church with the hunger for hierarchical advancement, when the advice of lawyers and the protection of its financial interests trump ethical ways of dealing with the clergy sexual abuse crisis, and where hatchet-clergymen are deployed at arms length by higher echelon church leaders with economic rationalizations that are little different from the Machiavellian intrigues of the corporate world. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,904
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,994

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,032
Tête enseignante GPT0,236
Écart entre enseignants0,204 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle