Chris Rostov. Contested Ethnic Identity: The Case of Macedonian Immigrants in Toronto, 1900-1996
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Chris Rostov. Contested Ethnic Identity: The Case of Macedonian Immigrants in Toronto, 1900-1996. Oxford: Peter Lang, 2010. 318 pp. Notes. Bibliography. Index. $76.95 sc. Treatments of intraethnic relations between successive waves of immigrants remain understudied in Canadian immigration historiography. In using Macedonian immigration to Toronto during the twentieth century as a case study, Chris Rostov successfully illustrates the similarities and differences between successive waves of immigrants. Rostov views the interethnic conflict over Macedonian identity in Toronto as multidimensional (159). The author proposes that the underlying basis of the conflict is the fact that ethnic Bulgarian, Greek, and Macedonian communities in Canada all claim 'Macedonia' and 'Macedonian' as terms that historically belong to them. As a result, Contested Ethnic Identity evaluates each group's attempt in the postwar period to deny their neighbours' historic claim to Macedonia. Due to the historic and political events that led to the geographic division of Macedonia among the countries of Bulgaria, Greece, and Serbia, the immigrants that came to Toronto developed three distinct identities: Bulgarian, Greek, and Macedonian where 'Macedonia' and 'Macedonian' held different meanings for each of the three groups. Kostov argues that until the late 1940s, Macedonian immigrants in Toronto held a strong ethnic Bulgarian identity (4). Hence, an overwhelming majority of ethnic Bulgarian immigration to Canada also came from the historic region of Macedonia. These same immigrants primarily settled in Toronto and became a major centre of the Macedonian Diaspora. As a result, the founders of the Bulgarian community in Canada were 'Macedono-Bulgarians'--Macedonians who viewed themselves as ethnic Bulgarians due to a shared history, belief in Orthodox Christianity, and a common language (275). Contested Ethnic Identity successfully demonstrates that individual immigrants along with community elites contested Macedonian identity through history, language, control of local churches, and even disputed the heritage of prewar Bulgarian immigrants from Macedonia (232). Macedonian ethnic identity was first propagated by left-wing intellectuals under the direction of the Comintern in the 1920s and 1930s, and gained mass support only in the late 1940s with the codification of a Macedonian language in 1944. Interestingly, Kostov notes that prior to the Second World War, immigrants in the United States and Canada used the words 'Macedonian' and 'Macedonia' as geographic terms, thus avoiding any link to ethnicity. Ethnic Bulgarian communist immigrants from Macedonia founded the Macedonian People's League in an attempt to support Yugoslavia's claim that Macedonia was a distinct ethnic nation (192-193). In 1959, Yugoslavia cemented its position and claimed it was the true representative of Macedonia and Macedonian identity in an attempt to undermine the majority Bulgarian ethnic identity of Macedonians in Europe and elsewhere. During the period between 1950 and the 1980s, proponents of an ethnic Macedonian identity in Canada were largely opposed by the ethnic Bulgarian community. Kostov utilizes Peter Vasiliadis' Who Are You? and Lillian Petroff's Sojourners and Settlers to illustrate their important contributions to the history of Macedonian immigration to Canada. In his view, both monographs use archival sources and oral interviews to inaccurately argue that an ethnic Macedonian community existed in Toronto prior to 1939 (118). Kostov's own consultation of archival and primary documents in Bulgaria, Library and Archives Canada, and the Multicultural History Society of Ontario--where oral and textual sources identified by ethnolingual group as Macedonian were in fact Bulgarian--led him to determine that the pre-1939 immigrants from Macedonia came to Canada with a Bulgarian ethnic identity. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».