MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7932324 · doi:10.1177/0145482x1210600106

Telephone Accessibility for Individuals with Dual Sensory Impairments: A Case Study

2012· article· en· W7932324 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Paul Evers, Paul Barber, Walter Wittich

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Visual Impairment & Blindness · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Établissements canadiensUniversité de MontréalMAB-Mackay Rehabilitation Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSensory systemPsychologyBlindnessDual (grammatical number)AudiologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationCognitive psychologyMedicineOptometry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Rehabilitation efforts for children with congenital dual sensory impairments, or deaf-blindness, have a long-standing history. Rehabilitation for older people with acquired dual impairments has recently moved to center stage because of the increasing number of clients who require such services (Saunders & Echt, 2007). For both these groups of clients, service delivery follows already established pathways. However, it has been our experience that a third group of rehabilitation clients, namely, those who are affected by slowly progressive and early-onset impairments, often require individually tailored unique interventions that need to remain flexible over long periods. This Practice Report describes one such process in which a client's (and the rehabilitation agency's) rehabilitation goal was to make telephone services accessible in the presence of a progressive sensory-and-motor impairment that was due to Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) syndrome. CMT syndrome is one of the most commonly inherited neurological disorders (Garcia, 1999; see also ). Discovered in 1886 by three physicians, Jean-Martin Charcot, Pierre Marie, and Howard Henry Tooth (Charcot & Marie, 1886; Tooth, 1886), CMT affects an estimated 2.6 million people worldwide. Symptoms usually begin in late childhood or early adulthood. The neuropathy of CMT affects both motor and sensory nerves. Persons with CMT slowly lose the use of their extremities, and some lose sensory nerve function, thereby impairing their hearing and vision. CMT is caused by mutations in genes that produce proteins that are involved in the structure and function of either the peripheral nerve axon or the myelin sheath. Consequently, these nerves slowly degenerate and lose the ability to communicate with their target cells. CMT usually does not affect life expectancy, but can cause severe disability. Even though there is no cure, physical or occupational therapy or both may be beneficial. CASE STUDY Access to the dossier information was approved by the Centre de recherche interdisciplinaire en readaptation de Montreal metropolitaine, the institutional ethics review board for rehabilitation agencies in the Montreal region. The person who benefited from this specific technological collaboration is John (a pseudonym), a 59-year-old man who was diagnosed with CMT syndrome at age 16. has a master's degree in English literature and is a passionate poet, which was also his main motivation for pursuing the use of assistive technology. At age 42, John was diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes mellitus; he used a manual wheelchair and lived independently until age 56, at which point he moved into a long-term assisted living environment. is possibly best described with a quote from his neurologist: He leads a remarkably full and active life. His visual impairment began during high school, at which time he began to develop his current skills in the use of assistive technology, such as his video magnifier, full view AOLITE spectacles (high-power reading glasses), and large-print computer software. John also uses a large-print watch and a large-print clock. attempted to learn and use braille, but he was unsuccessful because of sensory-and-motor deficits in his hands that were related to both CMT and diabetes. At the time of this rehabilitation intervention, his visual status was OD acuity 20/1500 (6/ 420), field diameter (Octopus) 22 degrees horizontal x 25 degrees vertical; OS acuity 20/1900 (6/480), 35 degrees horizontal x 35 degrees vertical. His hearing impairment began during adolescence; he has had only perceived static noise in his left ear since age 15 and continues to experience constant binaural tinnitus. John received a cochlear implant on his left side at age 56 and on his right side at age 58, in 2010. It is unclear to what extent the vision loss is related to his Type 1 diabetes mellitus or to complications related to CMT. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,445
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,040
Tête enseignante GPT0,384
Écart entre enseignants0,344 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2012
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Visual Impairment & BlindnessMême sujetCerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersTravaux en français237 207