MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W797461911

"Climate Power Play: Financial, Legislative, and Regulatory Moves toward a New Energy Economy": Time to Wake Up on Climate Change

2014· article· en· W797461911 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Senator Sheldon Whitehouse

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œAmerican University law review · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnergy
ThématiqueGlobal Energy and Sustainability Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLegislatureClimate changePower (physics)ConversationState (computer science)LawPleasureState legislaturePolitical scienceHistorySociologyPsychology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Thank you for inviting me to speak at today's Symposium, Power Play: Financial, Legislative, and Regulatory Moves Toward a New Energy Economy.1 I come from Rhode Island, where we take our environment and our state nickname-the Ocean State2-very seriously. This was perhaps best exemplified by an exchange between Senator Theodore Francis Green,3 a Rhode Island Senator of great longevity, and one of his Senate colleagues. Green had apparently done something to annoy a fellow Senator, who then turned to him and said, Theodore, how big is that little state of yours anyway? Green looked coolly back at him and said, Well, that would depend wouldn't it-high tide or low tide?My point here is that what's happening out there, particularly in our oceans, means a lot for Rhode Island, and that makes it a real pleasure for me to be here with you to have this conversation about climate change. I am perhaps the most optimistic person in the Senate-perhaps the most optimistic person in Congress-about our ability to get something done on this issue. And let me take a few minutes here to take you through my case.The first point in the case is that the reality of climate change is really now beyond serious or sober questioning.4 The atmosphere is measurably warming,5 Arctic ice is visibly melting,6 seas are warming and rising and acidifying,7 and these are not complex projections. They're not computer models. They are measurements. And they are measurements that can be made relatively simply.We also know how much harm the reality of climate change is causing. And we see its costs all around us. We see it in storm-damaged homes and flooded cities.8 We see it in drought-stricken farms and raging wild fires.9 We see it in bleaching coral10 and stressed shellfish.11 We see it in shifting habitats12 and migrating diseases.13These costs are not, however, being incorporated into the price of the coal or oil that are contributing to climate change by releasing carbon pollution when burned. The big oil companies and the coal barons have managed to offload all of those costs onto the rest of us-onto society.14 That is wrong, and it is also a market failure. It gives polluting industries an unfair advantage over cleaner energy producers.So that is why I'm working with a number of colleagues to put a price on carbon pollution-an accurate price on carbon pollution.15 The idea is a pretty simple one: the big polluters pay a fee to the American people to cover the cost of dumping their waste into our atmosphere and oceans.16At present, I will concede that political conditions in Washington do not make that possible. So what do we have to do then? We have to change those political conditions. I think we can do this, and I think we can do it more quickly than most people realize. I see the path before us; I see the tools to do it with, and it's up to us to pick up those tools and use them.I'll mention three of them.The first tool is one that's actually already been wielded, and I give President Obama credit for this. His Climate Action Plan17 has a particular strength to it, which is that the Environmental Protection Agency will be setting carbon pollution standards for new and existing power plants.18The worst fifty power plants in the United States pump out more carbon pollution than Canada.19 They pump out more carbon pollution than South Korea.20 So setting standards to limit pollution from these plants is a big deal. Now, when the owners of those power plants see those regulations and the associated costs of compliance coming at them, suddenly, an economy-wide carbon fee may look a little better. When their status quo is no longer that they get to pollute for free, their attitude about negotiating carbon legislation may shift. And when the polluters' attitude shifts, the Republican Party's attitude shifts.Think about it: if you're a practical politician representing a coal state, you have to realize that the jobs and revenue provided by that industry won't last forever. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,007
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,020
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,065

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0070,016
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0170,011
Communication savante0,0170,018
Science ouverte0,0020,007
Intégrité de la recherche0,0150,024
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0190,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,234
Écart entre enseignants0,219 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue˜The œAmerican University law review→Même sujetGlobal Energy and Sustainability Research→Travaux en français237 207→