MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W797776759

Evolution of a Manager: Career on the Line

2014· article· en· W797776759 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anthony J. Mento, Elizabeth H. Jones, Joseph Dilworth

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of critical incidents · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueManagement and Marketing Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésReputationManagementLine managementCareer managementBusinessProductivityPromotion (chess)Performance appraisalPsychologyMarketingPublic relationsPolitical scienceEconomicsLaw
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Mike Gibson's head throbbed as he re-read the October report. Although Gibson's specialty oil and vinegar bottling team had high productivity, his personal ratings on an upward feedback appraisal were the lowest of any manager. His second chance as a team manager seemed doomed. Reassigned to lead the bottling and packaging line in a food production facility, members of his team were reprimanded after falsifying quality reports. After the disciplinary incident, the team retaliated and gave Gibson an extremely low rating on an upward feedback appraisal. Although a graduate of a corporate management program and currently an MBA student, he seemed unable to apply the lessons of the classroom to his own work. The handwriting was on the wall--Gibson's career was on the line. Gibson's Career at Athenian and Start-Up of the New Packaging Line The Athenian Italian Products food manufacturing plant was headquartered in northwestern Pennsylvania. Management turnover at Athenian was quite low given its well-known reputation as a people-focused organization. Voluntary turnover had declined significantly since the recession began. Promotion was from within for the most part; turnover among manufacturing workers was similar to other manufacturing plants. Now in his early 30s, Gibson had worked for eight years at Athenian in various minor managerial roles. Gibson's managerial career began with a management trainee program where he spent several 10-month stints in different functional areas. Although Gibson received what he thought were strong performance evaluations, he had never landed a significant line position after the program. He apparently was not on the fast track. He tried to perform well and tried to develop relationships with more senior and influential managers. Due to his innate shyness and passivity, he found networking very stressful and extremely difficult. His peers sometimes told him he was way off base in his efforts. With an undergraduate degree in biology from a Canadian university, Gibson became a production team manager on the Gourmet Packaging team. Seeking to improve his managerial acumen, in the same year he enrolled in an AACSB-accredited, part-time MBA program near his home. About the time Gibson enrolled in graduate school, Athenian made the largest acquisition in its history. A newly acquired packaging line added to the workload of the existing two-line, three-shift, 22-person operation. Mid-level manager Russell Cavendish noticed that Gibson had recently enrolled at his alma mater, and offered him the production team management slot for the new packaging line. Cavendish told Gibson that he appeared to have the right management skills to be successful there. The previous manager had been a marginal performer who retired prior to the acquisition. Although he had no experience with large engineering projects or with start-ups, Gibson agreed to take the challenge. Now he led two existing packaging lines as well as starting the new packaging line. Among Gibson's new subordinates were two male crew leaders in their early 40s, each with more than 20 years of experience; an eight-person crew of seven males and one female, each with an average of 15 years of experience; and a female engineer, Shirley Wainwright, in her early 40s. While Wainwright had 15 years of company experience, she had minimal involvement with projects of the scope of this new line. The project plan called for a 1-year installation with the goal of reaching a capacity of 400 bottles per minute and an efficiency metric of 60%. Wainwright would manage the installation, mechanical troubleshooting, and improvements. Gibson was to ensure the proper training of the new packaging team. After one year, the line achieved the 400 bottles per minute goal, yet the efficiency rating was only 50%. Gibson believed that the root cause of his team's efficiency problems rested with the faulty execution of the new line by Wainwright, the project engineer. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,581
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,398

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,274
Écart entre enseignants0,248 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of critical incidentsMême sujetManagement and Marketing EducationTravaux en français237 207