Hoping for More: Having Cancer, Talking Faith and Accepting Grace
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
After I was diagnosed with prostate cancer, a frequent companion of men my age, I spoke first to those closest to me informed.In one particular instance I was speaking of my cancer with my former seminary colleague and friend Allen Jorgenson.After a few brief exchanges he brought to my attention a book by Dr. Deanna Thompson called Hoping for More.In retrospect I think Allen knew that this book would be a "two-fer" (to use current lingo) for me.He was dead He knew that I had read and reviewed her earlier book on Luther, Crossing the Divide (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2004), which book on the Reformer's theology that I have ever read.Knowing that and having told me he was going to have his class read portions of Hoping for More, he told me about the content of this book with the suggestion that Knowing that I was going to the annual conference of the Society of Biblical Literature (SBL) and the American Academy of Religion (AAR) in Chicago, I discovered that Dr. Thompson was going to be the to buy the book before I left for the Conference to no avail.On the first day of the conference I was able to buy it at the publisher book stall, but I only had the chance to read about eighteen pages of it before she and I had a chat at the café area near the book stalls.Suffice it to say that, in person, Deanna Thompson echoes the Deanna Thompson in the book to perfection (albeit the kind of Lutheran "simul justus et peccator" that we are required to affirm).How to review such a book?Virtually impossible, or, at least, most difficult!And, no, I am not talking about any personal stuff having to do with my own cancer.What I am talking about is having neither the time nor space to narrate the Nonetheless, I try in two faltering ways: thematic highlights and 'tasting the book."First, the thematic highlights.After some serious disabling back pain, Deanna Thompson went in for medical tests, only to receive the shocking di breast cancer, a lethal stage that numerically means that her chance of living beyond five years is slender indeed.Add to that the facts that she is a mom of two girls at the cusp of teen-age-dom, that she and her beloved husband Ne that somewhere in this book this P.K. called herself "a nice Minnesota girl") and that the best part of her career lay ahead of her, then one can see how absolutely devastating the news of this monstrous cancer was.Hoping for More is a journey, Deanna Thompson's journey from that fateful diagnosis to the present, living with cancer as a constant companion in all facets of her rich life -family, friends, faith and academic life.She invites you into her life with ca openness to the point where the reader is compelled to feel privileged to share her walk.One becomes her companion (compagnon means "breaking bread with") whereby Dr. Thompson lays bare her fears, her pain, her faith Hoping for More: Having Cancer, Talking Faith and Accepting Grace
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,013 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,010 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,026 | 0,008 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».