Diverse Regions: Building Resilient Communities and Territories 2014 Regional Studies Association European Conference, Izmir, Turkey, 15-18 June 2014
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The 2014 Regional Studies Association European Conference took place in Izmir, Turkey, from 15 to 18 of June under the theme 'Diverse regions: building resilient communities and territories'. Against the consensus that building resilient regions is particularly important in the wake of the global economic crisis, the conference sought to present a timely opportunity to discuss the issues of diversity, variety and resilience to establish the need and nature of future research imperatives, and to address the concerns and challenges confronting policymakers and practitioners. Hosted at the Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey, the three-day conference had a strong emphasis on policy and practice, particularly related to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's (OECD) agenda for stronger, cleaner and fairer economies and the European Union (EU) 2020's call for smart, inclusive, sustainable economies. As a 'developing, growing and innovative' non-capital city, Izmir offers a live laboratory to explore the opportunities brought by diversifying its traditional industries, as well as how cities and regions can work to re-imagine their place in the world.Conference organisation and contributionsOnce again, the Regional Studies Association (RSA) kept its high standard in organising the whole event, such as providing shuttle services between the conference venue and accommodation. There was also a good mix of academic participants and policy practitioners from across Europe and internationally, which encouraged interdisciplinary debate related to the broad advancement of regional studies and dialogue between academics and practitioners. The conference had twenty-two gateway themes, as well as fourteen special organised sessions, both of which exceeded the numbers organised at the last European conference (Table 1). In total, there were over 255 papers presented in around sixty sessions. The majority of delegates were from continental Europe and the UK, however there was also a significant international element, with delegates and papers related to China, US, Canada, Nigeria, Cumbria and Brazil among many others. This reflects the dedicated efforts of the Regional Studies Association to expand its global reach, especially towards China and North America. The presence of a large number of delegates from South America reinforced the success of the Association's Global Conference held in Brazil earlier in 2014.Plenary sessionsThree plenary sessions were offered during the conference. The first focused on 'regional studies versus today's challenges'. Plenary speakers included Professor Betsy Donald from the Department of Geography at Queen's University and Professor Ron Boschma, Director of the Centre for Innovation, Research and Competence in the Learning Economy (CIRCLE) at Lund University. The overall tone of the presentations focused on the challenges for regional development in an age of austerity and how regional resilience could be better constructed. Betsy Donald presented worrying pictures on growing government debts and the rising unemployment rates in the EU, US and Canada. She adapted Piketty's inequality story to show that intra-regional inequality was also increasing throughout the world. This led Donald to suggest that taxation on global capital and a scaling up of fragmented local actions were the way forward. Against the setting of economic crisis, Ron Boschma posed the question: 'how does one understand regional resilience from a path dependency perspective?' He suggested that the evolutionary approach to regional resilience was not about the short-term ability of regions to recover from a shock in an equilibrium framework, but about the extent to which a shock affected the long-term ability of regions to develop new growth paths. The three dimensions of industrial variety, networks and institutional changes could all interact with a region's resilience.The plenary session on the second day provided a direct dialogue between academia, practitioners and policymakers on the theme of the EU and Turkey. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,009 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,043 | 0,008 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».