MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W80884824

Weight Status and Body Image Satisfaction in Adult Men and Women

2010· article· en· W80884824 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Natalie Phillips, Anton F. de Man

Notice bibliographique

RevueNorth American journal of psychology · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueEating Disorders and Behaviors
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPsychologySocial psychologyPerceptionFeelingObject (grammar)Situational ethicsSelf-imagePrejudice (legal term)BeautyHuman physical appearancePopularityPhysical attractivenessAttractivenessSelf-conceptIdentity (music)HostilityInterpretation (philosophy)Aesthetics
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The self-concept is the awareness one has of oneself. It consists of perceptions of the self as object and as doer, together with the feelings and values associated with these views (Rogers, 1951). The self-concept is not a singular notion but rather a collection of hundreds of self- perceptions. Among those perceptions it is possible to identify specific clusters of selves. One of those clusters is body image, which may be defined as the perceptions of and attitudes toward one's own physical appearance (Cash, Phillips, Santos & Hrabosky, 2004). Body image is not simply a mirror-like reflection of external reality. Although the body concept includes objective physical attributes, its contents and associated positive or negative interpretations are highly subjective and influenced by one's environment. One tends to internalize into one's bodily self-concept the reactions and expectations of others which are communicated through interpersonal feedback, through the media, or through cultural attitudes. The integration and interpretation of this information affects one's body image, one's body ideal, and one's level of satisfaction with one's body. Negative attitudes toward certain body-images are often communicated in Western society. They reflect a prejudice against larger individuals that is conveyed though the media, conditioned into our children, evident in hiring practices, and present in everyday discourse (McEvoy, 1994; Schwartz & Brownell, 2004). Anti-fat attitudes in Western culture reinforce the belief that being thin is desirable and beautiful; slimness is often equated with personal success, popularity, and attractiveness (Hawkins, Richard, Granley & Stein, 2004). Many feel pressured to conform to this ideal (Foreyt et al., 1994). Those who fall short may feel self-conscious, if not ashamed (Puhl & Brownell, 2001), and may develop a negative body image (Tiggemann & McGill, 2004). The effects of these physical ideals held by society and communicated through the media (Botta, 2003; Cusumano & Thompson, 1997; Durkin & Paxton, 2002; Hargreaves & Tiggemann, 2003; Harrison, 2003) are already noticeable during adolescence and earlier, particularly in girls. Long before adolescence, many girls worry about their weight and want to be thinner (McKnight Investigators, 2003). During adolescence, girls often are concerned about gaining weight (Nichter, 2001), and a large percentage believes that they are overweight even though most of them are not (Siegel, 2002). Many are self-conscious about their appearance and are dissatisfied with their bodies (Granleese & Joseph, 1993; Simmons & Blyth, 1987). This body dissatisfaction increases during adolescence and continues into adulthood (Rosenblum & Lewis, 1999). Body dissatisfaction is found less often in boys (Vincent & McCabe, 2000), who worry less about their weight and are more likely to be satisfied with their bodies (Walcott, Pratt, & Patel, 2003). Unlike girls, who tend to be critical of their appearance, boys place a lower value on physical attractiveness but instead may worry about their physical abilities (Jaffe, 1998). This emphasis on appearance in girls and ability in boys parallels the two main aspects of the self-concept, that is, self-as-object and self-as-doer (Rogers, 1951; Hamachek, 1985). Self-as-object is the image of oneself as a me or an object; in terms of the bodily self, one sees oneself as a person with particular physical characteristics. The self-as-doer refers to the perception of oneself as an I or a person who physically can perform in a particular way. It appears that as far as the bodily self is concerned, girls emphasize the self-as-object aspect, whereas in boys the accent lies on self-as-doer. This gender difference continues into adulthood with women focusing on display (physical appearance) and men on functionality (physical abilities) (Halliwell & Dittmar, 2003). …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,010
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,020

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,306
Écart entre enseignants0,300 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations38
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNorth American journal of psychologyMême sujetEating Disorders and BehaviorsTravaux en français237 207