Fishing in Contested Waters: Place and Community in Burnt Church/Esgenoôpetitj
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Sarah J. King, Fishing In Contested Waters: Place and Community in Burnt Church/Esgenoopetitj. Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press, 2013. 203 pages. ISBN 978-1-442-61096-5. $24.95 paperback.This new book takes us to a notorious flashpoint in Atlantic Canada as it reads antecedents, events, and their aftermath through an interdisciplinary lens. The goal is to develop an account more attentive than its predecessors to the points of view of both the English-Canadian and the Mi'kmaw parties to a dispute involving lobster and much more. King dedicates her study to the people of both Burnt Churches. She thus makes clear from the outset the sincerity of her attempt at an evenhandedness that may yet help to heal deep and lasting wounds more effectively than church and state have been able to do. But that healing process will also require the treaty-based, post-racist redistribution of opportunity and reward-action that is refused across Canada as unaffordable and unfairly preferential, thus bringing the racist underpinnings of a ruthlessly extractive economy to the caustic attention of United Nations rapporteurs like Olivier de Schutter and James Anaya.King completed a year of ethnographic field work in the communities, gaining access to and winning the trust of key participants in and observers of the conflict, and building from their testimony a better sense of the roots and ramifications of events that reveal a number of Canada's dirty secrets to the world. There is no direct mention, however, of her seeking clearance from Mi'kmaw Ethics Watch (the committee that oversees, through its articulated principles and protocols, all research involving Mi'kmaw people). In six chapters and a postscript, the author charts the consequences of the Supreme Court decision in the Donald Marshall case in September 1999. This decision placed the Court, before its subsequent and unprecedented clarification, well ahead of popular opinion in colonial and neocolonial Canada in recognising the Mi'kmaw fishing and harvesting rights entrenched in the Treaties of Peace and Friendship (1760/61) with the British Crown. Two years of followed Marshall, as the Mi'kmaq tried to act once again upon their rights in the lobster fishery in face of settler opposition, media incomprehension and backlash, and state-sponsored violence. On the basis of participant observation and interviews represented by numerous and memorable voices from two internally divided and externally combative communities, King brings to life for the reader a conflict over legitimacy and belonging in a contested place. This story of predictable embitterment, official bungling, and fragile compromise is skilfully unfolded while unsettling the idea of home, both in Burnt Church and across nominally postcolonial Canada.King's understanding of place is notably enriched by the work of Keith Basso on the Western Apache and Alfred Crosby on ecological imperialism, but less so by her appeals to Heidegger. Like Carl Schmitt, who might also have been drawn on here, Heidegger is an important thinker with a problematic relation to Nazism and the forms of purified belonging which that political movement favoured. Disappointingly absent from King's account is the work of Marxist geographers inspired by Henri Lefebvre's seminal La production de l'espace (Anthropos, 1974). …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».