MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W81707704

Consumer Driven Forecasting to Improve Inventory Flow: Brown Shoe Company's Journey

2008· article· en· W81707704 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œjournal of business forecasting · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineDecision Sciences
ThématiqueOperations Management Techniques
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRevenueOrder (exchange)BusinessMarketingAdvertisingConsumer demandEconomicsFinance
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Brown Shoe Company, Inc. is a leading supplier of footwear with 12,000 employees and annual revenues of $2.4 billion. Based in St. Louis, Missouri, this consumer-focused company operates over 1,400 retail shoe stores in the United States, Canada, and China under the names of Famous Footwear, Naturalizer, Brown Shoe Closet, FX LaSaIIe, Franco Sarto, and Shoes.com (its e-commerce subsidiary). Its brands, which include Naturalizer, Life Stride, Franco Sarto, Via Spiga, Carlos by Carlos Santana, Etienne Aigner, Dr. Scholl's, Nickels Soft, and Buster Brown, are sold at over 2,000 department stores, mass-merchandisers, independent, and specialty stores worldwide. BACKGROUND With 90 million pairs of shoes sourced annually, orders were previously placed in overseas factories. Orders were delivered as we placed them, but there was no systematic process or mechanism to make adjustments to orders based on consumer demand. This was simply because we did not have an effective way of knowing how our shoes were selling at retail. We were limited to ad hoc reporting and emailing order changes, but we were not reacting to consumer demand. There was no systematic way of updating forecasts based on consumer activity. To become more consumer-driven, a forecasting process was needed to synchronize consumer demand with factory operations so that we could service retail customers more effectively. We needed to capture information about our consumer's purchases, which could then be used for our sourcing and inventory management. In July 2004, Brown Shoe began its journey by manually feeding Point of Sales (POS) information obtained from its 1, 100 Famous Footwear stores into a single PC. We wanted to see what kind of forecast we could generate and what we could do with that information. It turned out to be a great success. Forecasts improved, stockouts went down, and sales went up. At that point, we decided to look for a formal system by which we could automate the entire process. The firm chose Logility Voyager Solutions, in part because of its ability to handle highly seasonal, short life cycle merchandise, since 75% of our product offerings are new each season. During the four-month implementation, the biggest challenge was internal - the need for a huge amount of data to be organized and loaded into the new system. We had a lot of rich EDI Point of Sales history from our customer base, but it had to be organized in a way it could be useful to the company. With Logility 's system, we had highly accurate weekly forecasts of consumer sales, which improved our inventory flow to retailers. When a shoe is in high demand by consumers, the chance to sell more of it in-season requires a quick reaction. POS FORECASTING PROCESS Today, Brown Shoe closely collaborates with its Famous Footwear retail store chain on inventory planning by obtaining POS data on weekly sales in order to get retail replenishment as close to true market demand as possible. Retailers provide POS data by size, width and store, clearly pointing to which shoes are selling best. The system rolls forward weekly and recalculates the forecast for each item using the most recent week of POS we receive. The Demand Planning system generates forecasts for all of Famous Footwear's items. In addition, weekly POS feeds are a key driver for Brown Shoe's In-Season Replenishment (ISR) system. The system calculates item and size inventory needs and adjusts the receipt flow based on how the item is performing in stores. The company has been highly successful in forecasting shoes and their sizes. The improvements in forecast accuracy result in fewer quantity adjustments in purchase orders and allow for the factories to stage materials ahead of time. This reduced the lead-times by about 50 days for core Brown Shoe items selling at Famous Footwear because orders went from being monthly to every other week resulting in smaller quantities. For every style and color of footwear, we have typically 12 to 18 sizes. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,006
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,681
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,882

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0060,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,181
Tête enseignante GPT0,332
Écart entre enseignants0,150 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle