MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W81766684

Under an Owl Moon: Topos and Abundance in Jardine's Ecopedagogy

2006· article· en· W81766684 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jason Wallin

Notice bibliographique

RevueJCT · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueEcocriticism and Environmental Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNarrativeUncannySociologySymbol (formal)HistoryArt historyPsychoanalysisPsychologyLiteraturePhilosophyArtLinguistics
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Preamble I first met David Jardine in 1993 as an undergraduate student at the University of Calgary. At the time, I was enrolled in a required course entitled Methods in Early Childhood Education. Having heard that this class was typically quite dry and overly-methodological to the point of being reductionist, I was shocked when such an unconventional looking professor entered the room. Wearing hiking boots, a t-shirt and jeans, Jardine scrawled his name on the board in illegible figures, noting it was his first year teaching the course. After a brief introduction, Jardine began the class by lighting several candles and dimming the lights. One candle, situated in the center of the table, was affixed to the top of a bear skull! It was an eerie and uncanny sight. Behind the candles, the faintly illuminated Jardine began to read from Jane Yolen's Owl Moon (1987), a visceral narrative in which a father takes his young daughter 'owling' on a cold winter night. Beyond the literal mindedness of much teaching methodology, Owl Moon enacted an implicit narrative of care, of ecological mindedness and identity in kinship. This kinship not only occurred between father and daughter, it extended to those absent, and to those encounters through which we become aware of place (topos). These features were not merely particular to this one specific narrative. Instead, they had a wider 'hearing' in the world, in our relationships with children, and to our identities as students, student teachers and teachers. These features of patience, of responsibility, of place and interest (inter esse--the liminal space) appear throughout Jardine's ecopedagogical approach to curriculum study. Owl Moon was not merely one book in a litany of children's literature that Jardine could have selected. It was specific to our experience of wandering into new spaces, of being out in the cold, and of not knowing in advance what lies in wait beyond our wanting and doing (Gadamer, 1989, p. xxvii). In hindsight, Jardine's use of Owl Moon seems blatantly deliberate. Yet, rather than merely one more book to read or 'do,' Owl Moon provided a generous space in which we could gather to 'work out' our shared experience as hesitant initiates and newcomers to the study of curriculum. Borderline Figures Throughout Jardine's work as a researcher, professor, and practicum supervisor, he has endeavored to cultivate and navigate the interrelationships between hermeneutics, ecology and pedagogy. Drawing upon such philosophers as Wittgenstein, Heidegger, and Gadamer, Jardine has sought to explore the role of interpretation as germane to ecological interconnectedness, generativity, kinship and ancestry. Further, by setting these philosophers in relation to the ecological writings of Wendel Berry, poetry of Gary Snyder, and the Jungian psychoanalytic oeuvre of James Hillman, Jardine explores the interrelationships between young/old, tradition/natality, and innovation/ proof. In a move that foregrounds the notion of curriculum as a deconstructed text, Jardine has constantly sought to maintain a passage, an inter esse, between the codified binary enunciations posited by the Cartesian antecedents of structuralism. Pivoting on the dual gesture of composition and decomposition, Jardine mirrors the Heideggerian double movement of Destruktion (Destruction) and Abbau (Creation), focusing on the 'liminal' borderline character Hermes, the figure from which hermeneutics derives its name. For Jardine, Hermes is a figure critical to an understanding of interpretation particular to an examination of such borders and boundaries as student-teacher (1992), self-other (2000a), and mystery-mastery (1994). As a thief, Hermes intimates the role of interpretation in stealing the illusory assumption of control and mastery from beneath our feet. Drawing upon the mythopoetic writing of Hillman, Jardine notes how Hermes subverts our best laid plans and desire for objective distance in lieu of keeping the world open and enticing and alive and inviting (Jardine, 1994, p. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,015
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,039

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0150,016
Communication savante0,0090,006
Science ouverte0,0010,012
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,203
Écart entre enseignants0,193 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJCTMême sujetEcocriticism and Environmental LiteratureTravaux en français237 207