MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W82143440

The Effects of a Counselor-Led Guidance Intervention on Students' Behaviors and Attitudes.

2001· article· en· W82143440 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sharon M. Schlossberg, John D. Morris, Mary Lieberman

Notice bibliographique

RevueProfessional School Counseling · 2001
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueCounseling Practices and Supervision
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTruancyPsychologyAttendanceIntervention (counseling)NinthAcademic achievementMedical educationPedagogyDevelopmental psychologyMedicinePolitical scienceCriminologyPsychiatry
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Ninth grade students, faced with myriad challenges as they enter high school, have confronted a sense of anonymity and helplessness as they negotiate school's bureaucratic maze (DaGiau, 1997). Issues that surface in adolescence such as low grades, truancy, pregnancy, drug use, criminal offenses, dropping out of school, and even attempted suicide may be exacerbated when students lack the support and assistance to make a successful transition to the high school environment (Cairns, Pepler, & Cairns, 1997). Furthermore, many students advance from middle school under-prepared to respond to the increased demands of high school. The National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988, which provided trend data about critical transitions experienced by students, found that 60% of eighth graders studied had not discussed the selection of their high school classes with a school counselor (Office of Educational Research and Improvement, 1990). Of this same group of eighth graders, more than 10% had already demonstrated attendance problems and 30% had already displayed academic problems prior to entering high school (Office of Educational Research and Improvement, 1990). To ease this difficult transition, school counselors and other faculty and staff should provide increased support and assistance to new ninth grade students (Killin & Williams, 1995; Stanciak, 1995). Studies on high school attrition have indicated that preventative counseling, occurring before students are in crisis, reduced the risk of these students dropping out later (Bearden, Spencer, & Moracco, 1989; Morey, Miller, Rosen, & Fulton, 1993; Praport, 1993; Wirth-Bond, Coyne, & Adams, 1991). Unfortunately, because of increasing nonguidance-related responsibilities and very large student caseloads, the school counselor's ability to deliver an appropriate level of help to students has been hampered (Kuhl, 1998; Rye & Sparks, 1999). If programs are not designed proactively for success, addressing the needs of the group at large as well as the specific needs of individuals, students will inevitably be overwhelmed and overlooked. Over the past 20 years, the profession of school counseling has responded to this challenge by shifting its focus toward a broad comprehensive, developmental, competency-based approach that applies to the dayto-day happenings in schools (Radd, 1998). No longer seen from an ancillary remediation services approach, school guidance and counseling services have been aimed at all students, not merely at a limited number of students with special needs (Alberta Department of Education, 1997; Gysbers & Henderson, 1997; Kuhl, 1998; Walz & Bleuer, 1997). Whereas the traditional approach had been reactive, crisis-driven, unplanned, and focused on information, scheduling, records, and noncounseling functions, the comprehensive developmental guidance approach is planned, preventative, and proactive (Lukach, 1998). The American School Counselor Association supported the implementation of comprehensive developmental programs at all educational levels (Kuhl, 1998), and this model has become the chief way of organizing and managing guidance and counseling programs (Gysbers & Henderson, 2000). In addition, school counseling has shifted from a position orientation-in which the worth of counseling was determined by the qualifications of the counselor-- to a program focus emphasizing activities that made a demonstrable difference in students' performance (Gysbers & Henderson, 1997; Walz & Bleuer, 1997). Programs have been increasingly required to demonstrate student outcomes and program accountability (Alberta Department of Education, 1997; Radd, 1998), with prioritized student goals and behavioral outcomes for each grade level designed as part of the regular school curriculum (Walz & Bleuer, 1997). The emphasis is on activities that help students acquire needed understanding and skills as they pass through the developmental stages of life (Lukach, 1998; Walz & Bleuer, 1997). …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,009
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,018

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,381
Écart entre enseignants0,367 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations18
Publié2001
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueProfessional School CounselingMême sujetCounseling Practices and SupervisionTravaux en français237 207