Biomass and Carbon Allocation in Chronosequence of White Pine (Pinus strobus L.) plantations in Southern Ontario, Canada
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This study assessed biomass and carbon (C) allocation in a chronosequence of four White pine (Pinus strobus L.) plantation forests planted in 2002 (WPP02), 1989 (WPP89), 1974 (WPP74), and in 1939 (WPP39), in southern Ontario, Canada. A plotbased inventory and destructive tree sampling were conducted in 2004 to assess allocation of oiomass and C in ecosystem components, as well as allometry of tree biomass. Seasonal and annual patterns of litter and branch fall were also determined. Individual tree biomass components as well as sapwood area have strong site specific allometric relationships with tree diameter. Except for foliage biomass, strong single allometric equations could also be obtained across all sites and stand ages. Whereas allometry of individual tree components may be affected by site conditions and stand age, total tree biomass solely depended on tree diameter. This suggests that total biomass of White pine may be predicted from single allometric equations with DBH as input variable across sites and even across regions. Relative partitioning of tree biomass components was strongly related to tree age. Stem biomass gains major importance with increasing tree age at the cost of all other components comprising 69% of total tree biomass after 65 years. Whereas site conditions influenced the absolute amount of biomass and allometry of individual tree components, they did not affect their relative partitioning Only biomass of trees, woody debris, and small roots (2-5mm) showed agerelated patterns by increasing with greater stand age. Increase in tree biomass was highest during the early decades after establishment and after thinning practices. C storage in forest floor was 0.8, 7.5, 5.4, and 12.1 t C ha⁻¹ and C content in mineral soil was 37.2, 33.9, 39.1, and 36.7 t C ha⁻¹ at WPP02, WPP89, WPP74, and WPP39, respectively. Biomass of roots < 5mm was 0.3, 6.0, 8.9, and 7.5 t ha⁻¹ at WPP02, WPP89, WPP74 and WPP39, respectively. Annual litter fall was age independent with 5, 3 and 4 t ha⁻¹ y⁻¹ at WPP89, WPP74, and WPP39, whereas branch fall increased with age and basal area to 0.007, 0.17, and 1.38 t ha⁻¹ y⁻¹ at WPP89, WPP74, and WPP39, respectively. Average total tree biomass was 0.4, 67, 122, and 547 kg per tree with an uncertainty of less than 1, 5, 3, and 1 % at WPP02, WPP89, WPP74 and WPP39, respectively. Belowground to aboveground tree biomass ratio was 0.35, 0.19, 0.14, and 0.17 forWPP02, WPP89, WPP74, and WPP39, respectively, which suggests a considerable amount of C stored in root biomass. Above and below ecosystem C increased with an average rate of 1.9 and 0.5 t C ha⁻¹ y⁻¹ across the chronosequence, reaching 122 and 66 t C ha⁻¹ y⁻¹ respectively at age 65. Total net ecosystem C accumulation between age 2 and 65 was 147 t C ha⁻¹. Inventories limited to stem biomass may underestimate total tree biomass by up to 3 5% and total ecosystem C by up to 62%. Thus, estimations of C storage in forest ecosystems should include all above and belowground C pools, and its accuracy may be improved by predicting total treebiomass with allometric equations related to stand age and tree diameter.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,019 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle