Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Certainly unlike any sport, perhaps even unlike any other corner of popular culture, communicates in numbers. (1) We identify players not simply by name but by associated numbers--be they worn on a player's back or accumulated during the course of a game or career. It's not a matter of math but emotion. While the numbers 3, 4, and 5 mean the to a New York Yankees fan, they will never add up to 6 for a St. Louis Cardinals fan. (2) When reviewing a season or career, the game pauses for significant round numbers, symbolic barriers of greatness--20 and 300, 50 and 500, 200 and 3,000. These round numbers may not be destinations, only mileposts on the path to greater, although admittedly not as beautiful, numbers--be they iconic (Joe DiMaggio and 56) or controversial (Barry Bonds and 762). They give us pause because, as humans, we must take notice.3 This paper explores one of baseball's great round numbers--4,000--thirty years later, and it also looks into what factors went into the virtual erasing of Pete Rose's 4,000th career hit and, in turn, tenure from Montreal Expos franchise history. Reaching the all-time record was not inevitable. In 1984, an aging Rose was running on fumes; and as few teams were in the market for a sideshow, he was slipping through the cracks. If not for the Expos, he may not have played that season, which means, given less than three years of career left (only 312 career games for Rose remained), Cobb's record would have stood. Simply stated, Rose would not have achieved that mark without Montreal taking a chance on him--ultimately a failed one for the team. Despite that, little academic or journalistic discussion exists on that historic day or, larger still, Rose's brief but important tenure with the team. At a minimum, should provide breadcrumbs for spotty memories to follow back in time. When we lose or disregard a piece, it degrades the overall story. Members of the community participate in many activities designed to actively remember and reconstruct the past. Players (3) jersey numbers are retired and turn-back-the-clock games are held. Teams honor highly revered players by erecting statues of them in or around ballparks. Players will often wear a patch on their uniform to publicly recognize and honor a teammate who has recently passed away. Like individuals in other institutionalized fields of cultural production, those who comprise the baseball world participate in rituals, subscribe to magazines and belong to organizations dedicated to the game's history. (4) Expos lore is different from that of the Yankees or Dodgers, teams focused on a rich history of success, tradition, and larger-than-life superstars. The Expos' short history and, particularly, inglorious end have magnified every aspect of the organization's past. Just look to Marc Robitaille and Jacques Doucet's two-volume, 1,200-page history of the Expos, Il etait une fois les Expos, as an example of its history's exquisite excess. For comparison, a recently released four hundredth-anniversary edition of the King James Bible has only 1,510 pages. Despite its significance, Rose's tenure on Pierre de Coubertin Avenue was not only frequently ridiculed at the time by media--who chose to view it as a footnote, at best, and a management stunt, at worst--but it has been all but forgotten by historians today. Who can forget that Pete Rose passed through Montreal in 1984 on his way to notoriety? wrote Danny Gallagher and Bill Young in their 300-page love letter to the organization, Remembering the Montreal Expos. (5) My answer: seemingly everyone. When discussion in this paper depends on primary sources, I center my case on the reporting of the Montreal Gazette and La Presse, between the months of January and August 1984, using news stories and opinion pieces (columns and cartoons) from the news and sports sections as well as photographs and page design--all of which combine to show how those in the moment saw Rose and his 4,000th hit. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,022 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».