MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W83523699

2008 Town of Long Island Comprehensive Plan

2008· article· en· W83523699 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Long Island . Planning Board

Notice bibliographique

RevueDigitalCommons (California Polytechnic State University) · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueIsland Studies and Pacific Affairs
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPlan (archaeology)GeographyArchaeology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A History of Long IslandOver time, Long Island has shown many faces to the world: a remote self-sufficient fishing and farming community in the 1700s and 1800s; a summer playground for Portlanders in the late 1800s until World War I; site of a major Navy installation during World War II and into the 1950s; and the proposed site of a super tanker port in the 1960s and early 1970s.Today Long Island is a community of 900 people struggling to remain viable in the economic uncertainties of the 21st Century.About two hundred of those 900 people live year round on the island.Long Island is now one of 14 islands in Maine still supporting a year-round community.At the turn of the century, Maine had 300 such island communities. Long AgoClam shell heaps still contain bones of a species of giant beaver long since extinct, so we know they were among our early inhabitants.There is archaeological evidence that the Red Paint people were on Long Island (known as Smith's Island long ago), and we know that Native Americans were on our shores.Some lived here year-round, others only in the warm months.John Smith, that intrepid explorer and speculator, recorded a visit to Long Island on a map dated 1600 in the British Museum.Quite clearly the French visited the island, perhaps under duress, for they named the harbor facing seaside, Havre de Grace.The first European settler was John Sears from Boston in 1640.Very little is known of his goals, his activities, or the results.During this period around the turn of the century, the islands were being touted as health resorts and idyllic retreats.Large steamers from Boston and New York brought vacationers in droves.Large summer hotels were a big attraction; there were dozens of boarding houses; and most families had a room or two to accommodate the influx of visitors, many from Canada.At this time Long Island's real claim to fame was its summer clambakes.People came by the hundreds to eat clams, lobster, corn, potatoes, eggs, bread, and pickles, cooked outside over fires that consumed cords of firewood.They were served outside in big fields or in the pavilion built for that purpose.The most famous was the celebration of Portland's Centennial when over 2000 people ate 500 bushels of clams cooked over 16 cords of firewood! Cow IslandThe military came to Cow Island in 1901.It was known as Fort Lyon.It was established as a support for Fort McKinley, 300 yards across the water on Great Diamond Island.Fort Lyon featured a wharf, a powerhouse and two gun batteries.The first, completed in 1907, Battery Bayard was mounted with three guns that could fire 6-inch diameter shells eight miles.The second, completed in 1909, Battery Abbot mounted three guns that could fire 3-inch shells five miles.These two batteries were among 25 batteries with 73 guns and mortars in the five Portland Harbor forts: Williams, McKinley, Preble, Levet and Lyon.The forts were built out of fear that Portland Harbor could be invaded by an enemy fleet that might have taken over Saint John, New Brunswick or Halifax, Nova Scotia as a base of operations.Each battery had a specific role and field of fire in the coordinated system of forts defending the harbor.Battery Bayard's primary role was to help defend Hussy Sound.Battery Abbot had a dual role of helping guard Hussy Sound, as well as the back channel between the islands and the Falmouth mainland.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,791
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,740

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,231
Écart entre enseignants0,203 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueDigitalCommons (California Polytechnic State University)Même sujetIsland Studies and Pacific AffairsTravaux en français237 207