Notice bibliographique
Résumé
For Pharmacist Awareness Month 2015, the Canadian Pharmacists Association (CPhA) commissioned a national survey to determine Canadians’ perceptions and attitudes toward pharmacists and the range of health care services they provide. The survey, conducted by Abacus Data from February 14 to 22, 2015, with a sample of 2937 Canadians, yielded a range of positive results, demonstrating the high level of trust and confidence Canadians place in pharmacists. The number and scope of services that pharmacists can provide to patients has increased significantly over the past several years, and the survey results demonstrate that Canadians continue to support these expanded services. A large majority of Canadians trust pharmacists to provide advice on vaccinations (88%), the management of chronic conditions (88%), healthy lifestyle changes such as smoking cessation and weight loss (91%) and the management of common ailments like the cold or flu (94%). This high level of trust reflects the expanding role pharmacists are undertaking—and being recognized for—in the delivery of health care in Canada. Canadians not only trust pharmacists to provide a range of health care services, but according to the survey results, they are also very likely to use them. When asked whether or not they would consider going to their pharmacist to receive health care services, a majority indicated that they would consider going to their pharmacist for a flu shot or other vaccine (79%), for advice on medications (89%), for an appointment to review and discuss medications (82%), for smoking cessation advice (75%), for prescribing medications for minor health conditions (78%), for screening for medical conditions such as diabetes (66%) and for advice on the management of chronic disease such as diabetes or hypertension (69%). Canadians also make the connection between an expanded role for pharmacists and better health outcomes. Ninety-six percent of respondents had a positive impression of pharmacists, and 82% believed that pharmacists play a central or important role in the delivery of health care. Most Canadians agree that expanding the role of pharmacists would improve patients’ overall quality of life (82%), reduce overcrowding in emergency rooms and walk-in clinics (85%) and reduce overall health care costs (79%). Canadians clearly agree that the health care system would be improved by further enhancing the role of pharmacists in the delivery of health care services. Pharmacist Awareness Month is an opportunity to celebrate pharmacists and educate Canadians on the contribution that pharmacists make in the delivery of quality health care. The tagline for 2015, “Pharmacists: Trusted Care When and Where You Need It,” conveys the message that pharmacists are not only trusted leaders in the provision of frontline care but, as one of the most accessible health care providers in Canada, are able to provide quality care conveniently and quickly—a message that is clearly demonstrated in these survey results. More information about the survey, including province-specific results, can be located on the Pharmacist Awareness Month website at www.pharmacists.ca/pam.■
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,009 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,051 | 0,024 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».