Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Eula Biss On Immunity: An Inoculation Minneapolis, MN: Graywolf Press, 2014Since my first visit to Buffalo, New York in 1952, I have vacationed, studied and worked in the United States for periods of a few days to a full year on too many occasions to recount or recall. Still, I make no claim to understand American electoral politics better than any other foreigner. I do have some appreciation of its constitution, its two-party system and even its peculiar Electoral College; what I cannot quite grasp, however, is the tendency of its incumbent and aspirant office holders to begin campaigning for the next election before the dust has quite settled on the last one.I also have some difficulty coming to grips with the American culture, especially when seemingly unconnected issues at least temporarily find their way to the centre of political controversy. For instance, I find it more than passing strange that the American scientific community has done singular work in almost every imaginable field from outer space to particle physics and that the far-famed American know-how has been in the forefront of innovation from large-scale industrial manufacturing to nanotechnology; nonetheless, the people of the United States and many of their congressional leaders remain astonishingly ignorant of even the most fundamental facts of science. The far-famed tendency of Americans to be, for example, Biblical literalists and to reject the fact of biological evolution is just one of the most glaring examples of what seems to me to be an extraordinary paradox-equalled only, perhaps, by the eccentric juxtaposition of advanced nuclear knowledge and the extensive use of social media that coexists in the thoughts and actions of Islamic fundamentalists who cling to religious convictions that are plainly analogous to the antiquated notions of those in their US Bible-belt.Older Americans are strong supporters of requiring childhood vaccinations - 79% say they hold that view, compared with 59% of those under 30. (Anderson, February 2, 2015)These two phenomena-the apparent practice of continual electioneering and the pervasiveness of an anti-scientific ideology-has emerged already, almost two years before the forthcoming presidential elections of 2016. The current case in point concerns the public health measure of vaccination against communicable diseases-some of which had been fully eliminated in North America, but which are now staging a comeback thanks, in large measure, to the opposition that some people have to compulsory vaccination.Having grown up at the height of the polio epidemic and having experienced such childhood diseases as chicken pox (varicella), red measles (rubeola) and German measles (rubella), I am baffled by the fact that American politicians feel compelled to take a stand on whether or not publically mandated vaccinations should be compulsory. Most often, the case against vaccination is made on the basis of a uniquely American commitment to personal liberty and a preternatural distrust of anything having to do with government. Although quirky, this strain of American political thought at least has a pedigree of sorts and, when put in the language of contemporary libertarianism, it does represent a consistent and coherent, if not a cogent and convincing, political position.More dumbfounding are the blatantly false claims made by political candidates who are too close to the mainstream for comfort and who have made in the past or may make in the future allegedly credible holders of high office. The most publicized was probably the (not-socredible) presidential candidate Michele Bachmann who blurted out on Fox News (Weathers, 2015): There's a woman who came up crying to me tonight after the debate. She said her daughter was given that vaccine. She told me her daughter suffered mental retardation as a result.The more people know about it the better. Some people put faith and trust in their medical doctors, rather than put their faith and trust in God. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».