MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W83873100 · doi:10.1177/007327531205000302

Swedish in Name Only: The International Education of Nineteenth—Century Swedish Medical Students and Practitioners

2012· article· en· W83873100 sur OpenAlexaff
Stephan Curtis

Notice bibliographique

RevueHistory of Science · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHistory of Science and Natural History
Établissements canadiensMemorial University of Newfoundland
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHegemonyAdventureSpace (punctuation)SociologyHistoryMedia studiesPublic relationsLawPolitical sciencePoliticsArt history

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Travelling abroad to learn about the latest innovations has long history but the importance and mechanisms of these cultural and professional interactions has recently become of growing interest among historians of medicine. Scandinavia is often perceived as being largely peripheral to the events and ideas found on the continent or in Britain and this paper is an attempt to illuminate the degree to which Swedish physicians were part of the medical world of the nineteenth century. Their numerous applications to travel and the published accounts of their adventures certainly throw into question the notion that particular national forms of medical practice and specific innovations waited patiently for permission to cross national borders. Instead, medical students and physicians were actively engaged in the 'Europeanization' of medicine built upon multiple personal and professional connections throughout the continent. In 2005, Ute Frevert defined Europeanness as a web of communication and interaction ... [that] displays different degrees and patterns of involvement, shifting centers and margins, uneven and asymmetric relations, and competitive, often violent encounters, and proposed that various professional networks contributed to the dissemination of knowledge.1By arguing that centres and margins are not fixed in time and space, Frevert's definition also addresses one of the major short-comings with core-periphery models that envision single, hegemonic and largely permanent core and similarly fixed but much weaker periphery. The alleged subservience of the latter on the former is often attributed to the temporal lag between the discovery of innovations and their wider reception and adoption which in turn is dictated by how easily information is able to move between these areas. Timo Myllyntaus suggests six 'channels' by which technology flows from industrial cores to more peripheral areas.2 During the nineteenth century at least three of these same 'channels' existed for the transmission of medical innovations from the continent to Sweden. First, the Swedish government had long history of financing educational trips abroad for its physicians and students so that they could study at foreign universities, visit medical institutions, or attend international conferences. Second, the teaching of medicine within Sweden improved and attracted more and more students at the same time that professional organisations arose with their own journals to foster the exchange of ideas. Third, and perhaps most important was the willingness to accept and import medical knowledge from various European locations regardless of their level of international acclaim. The combination of these forces plus improvements in transportation that enabled individuals to flit from place to place much more easily than in the past, minimised the temporal lag between discovery and implementation. At the same time, the mixing of students and physicians from numerous countries significantly reduced the cultural distance between them. The shrinking of physical and cultural distances, process that quickened during the course of the nineteenth century, makes the utility of thinking in terms and cores increasingly suspect. A clear example of how far supposedly peripheral Sweden had come by the mid-1870s can be seen in the international acclaim Uppsala University received when it celebrated its quatercentenary in 1877. Representatives from thirteen different countries and forty-eight different universities, academies and societies arrived to participate in the festivities and were uniformly impressed with what they saw.3There has been long tradition in Sweden and the rest of Scandinavia of borrowing ideas and technology from abroad so it should not be surprising that medical innovations would similarly find their way into the Swedish cities and countryside.4 Some historians have pointed to Sweden's high literacy rate and the importance the population placed on education, the country's 'human capital', as key reasons for its rapid industrialisation during the late nineteenth century that enabled it to compete with the economic powerhouses of Britain and Germany. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,993
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,045

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0070,006
Communication savante0,0090,004
Science ouverte0,0010,009
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,031
Tête enseignante GPT0,288
Écart entre enseignants0,257 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHistory of ScienceMême sujetHistory of Science and Natural HistoryTravaux en français237 207