Investigating a Peer-to-Peer Community Service Learning Model for LIS Education.
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
IntroductionLibrary and Information Science (LIS) faculty attempt to impart balance of theoretical and practical knowledge and skills to prepare graduates as professionals in diverse settings. However, transition from student to professional is more than an epistemic shift; it is transformation of self, whereby learners come to exemplify values, behaviors, and thinking of professional community (Dall'Alba, 2009; Weidman, Twail, & Stein, 2001). This occurs when learners have opportunities to interact with established professionals (Mehra & Robison, 2009) as well as those whom profession serves. LIS programs facilitate this by engaging established professionals to teach, inform curricula, and supervise experiential learning opportunities. However, as Dall'Alba (2009) notes, the most challenging task of learning professional ways of being ... is left to students themselves (p. 43). This is problematic given that a clearly defined professional identity . . . [determines] . . . work-readiness, recruitment, retention, job satisfaction and work-related motivation (Tsang, 2010 p. 1). As LIS educators, how do we support students' journeys into profession?There are number of educational para- digms from which to draw answers to this question. LIS programs in North America have typically included practicum component as graduation requirement, and additional opportunities, such as part-time placements and longer co-operative terms exist to give students professional experience. Experiential learning, which emphasizes in situ problem solving and rests upon intrinsically motivated self-directed learners (Knud, 2007), is an important element of LIS education and is enthusiastically embraced by students. Another model, community service learning (CSL), is receiving increasing attention. CSL encourages students to contextualize course work and to acknowledge patrons as equals and experts, with goal of benefitting learner and community where learning occurs (Mehra & Robinson, 2009, p. 30). In addition, peer tutoring has been explored for its benefits for both tutees and tutors. This has received little recognition in LIS, despite intellectual, emotional and social gains that have been documented (Badura, Millard, Johnson, Stewart & Bartolomei, 2003; Elmendorf, 2006; Fantuzzo, Riggio, Connelly & Dimeff, 1989). Thus we sought to formally explore application of these experiential learning models in LIS education.From 2008 to 2010 we developed Rescue, an experiential learning opportunity for LIS students at University of British Columbia, which draws upon CSL and peer tutoring models. We hypothesized that by participating in program, emerging librarians would come to understand their position in learning process, act as role models, and enhance their knowledge and professional identity through reflection and interaction (Badura et al, 2003). In this paper, we describe Research Rescue and report on learning outcomes for LIS student participants. We begin paper by examining what it means to become an information professional. We then introduce peer tutoring as way of facilitating professional be- coming, rooting it in experiential and community service learning. Next, we describe Research Rescue program and report on students' experiences as peer tutors. Lastly, we analyze and interpret these experiences qualitatively, and discuss our findings. We provide evidence that students took steps towards formation of their professional identities through their participation in Research Rescue.Literature ReviewDiscussions concerning professional identity are abundant in LIS, yet tend to focus on stereotypes (e.g., Seal, 2008) or on changing identities of established professionals. Julien and Genuis (2011), for example, surveyed more than 700 Canadian information professionals to explore relationship between library instruction duties and self-identification as teacher. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,016 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle