MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W8409326 · doi:10.1097/00004836-199309000-00022

Toward a Theological Understanding of the Pentecostal Appeal to Experience

2001· article· en· W8409326 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Peter Althouse

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of ecumenical studies · 2001
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiquePentecostalism and Christianity Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRevelationBaptismReligious experienceWorshipRealmBlessingSanctificationVisionPhilosophyPneumatologyMessiahTheologyChristianityAppealReligious studiesSociologyLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction The role experience plays in Pentecostal worship and theologizing was aptly described by Frank Bartleman, an avid participant in Azusa Street revival, who was probably person most influential in spreading Pentecostal message through written accounts and preaching tours: Pentecostal methods look foolish to many but natural man receiveth not things of Spirit; just to extent he is in natural does he fall short of full conception of operation of Spirit of God. So people who have not experienced operation of Spirit cannot understand this fresh manifestation of God....But there is in experience and in every fresh realm of Spirit a whole realm of new of right kind, higher thought of God. Truth these days, very largely opens up to me by revelation. (1) Bartleman's emphasis upon religious experience is typical of Pentecostals. Pentecostals assert two primary moments of experience in crisis events of conversion and baptism of Holy Spirit with tongues, while some include second blessing experience of sanctification. They also believe that there are other moments of religious experience commonly encountered in worship as Spirit's presence is made known. Moreover, Bartleman's use of revelation suggests a special knowledge of God's truth through experience of Spirit, not only in scriptural illumination but also through visions, dreams, prophecy, and other charismatic phenomena. Religious experience, though, is a difficult concept to define. In an analysis of Pentecostalism, Harvard theologian Harvey Cox commented that, if Pentecostals are to construct a self-authentic and self-descriptive theology, they need to clarify they mean when they speak of For Cox, fundamentalism and experientialism are emerging spiritual paradigms that seek to create authentic links to sacred past. (2) Although experience assumes differing conceptual forms, Cox noted that its proponents see it as the key dimension of faith. (3) He claimed, however, that these two paradigms are fighting for dominance within Pentecostalism. (4) If Pentecostals are to side with experientialist camp, as Cox would prefer, then they need to define clearly what they mean by 'experience.' Otherwise a vacuous 'cult of experience,' too much in keeping with contemporary celebration of 'feelings' and endless search for sources of arousal and exhilaration, could undermine its authenticity. (5) The intent of this essay is to take up Cox's challenge and develop a clearer understanding of appeal Pentecostals make to experience. The premise here is that experience has varying degrees of meaning and conceptualization that need to be identified before one can speak accurately of Pentecostal experience. This essay, therefore, will first examine how scholars have attempted to understand experience within Pentecostal context. Second, a typology for understanding appeal to experience that was developed by late Jesuit priest and Toronto School of Theology professor George P. Schner will be used in an attempt to clarify appeal to experience in context of Pentecostalism. The Place of Experience in Pentecostal Scholarship Various scholars of Pentecostalism have been struggling to develop an understanding of experience that not only is philosophically and theologically credible but also is true to heart of Pentecostal identity. Donald Dayton has pointed to Pentecostals' use of a subjectivizing hermeneutic, which allows them to read narrative account of Day of Pentecost as experientially normative for receiving Spirit. (6) Pentecostals bring their own desires for fresh experiences of God to Lukan narrative in a dialectic hermeneutic between reader and text. Church of God Pentecostal theologian Steven Land has defined Pentecostal experience through category of crisis, in which believer's experience of Spirit is an existential encounter. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: Théorique ou conceptuel
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,011
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,032

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,044
Communication savante0,0110,007
Science ouverte0,0010,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,297
Tête enseignante GPT0,339
Écart entre enseignants0,042 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations11
Publié2001
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of ecumenical studiesMême sujetPentecostalism and Christianity StudiesTravaux en français237 207