MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W84342183

Zukovskij's Translation of Oliver Goldsmith's "The Deserted Village" (1)

2005· article· en· W84342183 sur OpenAlex
Kenneth H. Ober, Warren U. Ober

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

venuePublié dans une revue dont le pays d'attache est le Canada.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueGermano-Slavica · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiquePoetry Analysis and Criticism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoetryDoctrinePoliticsIndignationIrishLiteratureHistoryLawClassicsPhilosophyArtTheologyPolitical scienceLinguistics
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Stirred to indignation by the depopulation of the English villages and countryside which resulted part from the notorious Enclosure Acts, (2) Oliver Goldsmith (1730-1774) published 1770 what was to become his most famous and admired poem, Deserted Village. Based partly on his memories of Lissoy, his home village Ireland, the poem is primarily concerned with the fate of the dispossessed and uprooted tenants and cottagers of rural England and the villages they left behind. In his Dedication of the poem to Sir Joshua Reynolds, Goldsmith admits there may be objection to the poem on the grounds that the depopulation it deplores is no where to be seen, and the disorders it laments are only to be found the poet's own imagination. Goldsmith, response to the anticipated objection, asserts that I sincerely believe what I have written; I have taken all possible pains, my country excursions, for these four or five years past, to be certain of what I alledge, and all my views and enquiries have led me to believe those miseries real, which I here attempt to display. (3) Published on May 26, 1770, as a pamphlet, Deserted Village went through five authorized editions during the same year. By 1775 eight authorized editions, four pirated editions, two Irish editions, and a French translation had appeared. As Arthur Friedman points out his summary of the contemporary critical reaction to the poem, the reviews typically distinguish between the political doctrine, which they find some measure deficient or erroneous, and the poetical execution, to which they give high praise. Certainly the appearance of Deserted Village enhanced Goldsmith's reputation and established him as one of the foremost English poets of the day. (4) Thus it is not surprising a poem which had such an impact on the world of English letters should eventually come to the attention of Vasilij Andreevic Zukovskij (1783-1852), the Russian early Romantic poet-translator, who during a long career translated the works of such other poets as Thomas Gray, John Dryden, Alexander Pope, James Thomson, David Mallet, Robert Southey, Lord Byron, Thomas Moore, Sir Walter Scott, and Thomas Campbell, addition to Goldsmith. The publication of Zukovskij's translation of Gray's Elegy Written a Country Churchyard 1802 has more than once been declared to be the birthday of Russian poetry. (5) Zukovskij's attention was attracted to Goldsmith's Deserted Village the same year, probably under the influence of his friend and fellow poet-translator Andrej Turgenev, though his translation--comprising the first hundred lines of the poem--was not completed until 1805. Apparently Zukovskij's translation remained unpublished until 1902, when it appeared A.S. Arxangel'skij's edition of his works. (6) Zukovskij chose to translate only the first 100 lines of the 430-line poem, and it is clear from the internal evidence of Zukovskij's translation he regarded the portion he chose as a unity, with a beginning, a middle, and an end. The beginning consists of a nostalgic reminiscence of Auburn and the narrator's happiness there the pastoral setting; the middle contrasts the present desolation of the narrator's birthplace with the beauty of its bygone years and laments the devastation wrought by greed and luxury this once idyllic village; the conclusion reviews the narrator's long-cherished but finally blasted hopes of returning to end his days peacefully in the land of my fathers, under the canopy of familiar trees. The opening lines of Zukovskij's translation juxtaposed with the parallel lines of Goldsmith's poem will indicate how true to the spirit of the original Zukovskij's version really is: Goldsmith: Sweet Auburn, lovliest village of the plain, Where health and plenty cheared the labouring swain, Where smiling spring its earliest visit paid, And parting summer's lingering blooms delayed, Dear lovely bowers of innocence and ease . …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,933
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,996

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,240
Écart entre enseignants0,213 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle