MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W84370794

Media and Theory Through the Writing Process

2004· article· en· W84370794 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dion Dennis

Notice bibliographique

RevueAcademic exchange quarterly · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueLiteracy, Media, and Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPsychologyMistakeCompetence (human resources)PedagogyTest (biology)Mathematics educationNorm (philosophy)SociologySocial psychologyEpistemology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Fostering critical and literate habits of thought requires that teachers move beyond using learning strategies that compel students to binge and purge information in manner of bulimic. Utilizing concepts from Levi-Strauss, Whorf, Bahktin, Kristeva, Foucault, and Roland Barthes, this essay theorizes about an applied pedagogy that moves students from position of subjugated vassal and passive knowledge vessel to an active and engaged intertextual creator. As an application of theory, a discussion of a media-based assignment follows. Background Often, educational practices emphasize due deference and imitation. From an early age, many students are taught not to love learning for its own sake, but primarily for externally defined rewards. Students are exhorted to make straight As and to exhibit appropriate masks of docility. Educational strategies that exclusively stress these qualities are focused primarily on social control. While developing a type of tractability, though, teachers, students, parents, school boards, and even politicians frequently mistake short-term memorization for ability to create, apply and learn. By overemphasizing standards based on recitation and recognition, we have produced a generation of college students who may be obedient but poorly equipped educational consumers. results of large-scale National Writing Test attest to this outcome. results of test, administered to a representative sample of 19,000 twelfth-grade students by National Center of Education, tells us that twenty-six percent of twelfth-grade students do not write at a basic level of competency. Fifty-one percent write at minimal basic level of competence, while only twenty-four percent are rated as proficient or advanced. Not surprisingly, twelfth-grade scores in reading, math and science have fallen in tandem with decline in writing. conclusion of educational professionals is unsurprising: The twelfth grade scores are a real indication that students aren't ready to go to college and do work that's expected of them, according to Gaston Caperton, president of College Board. Designed to develop latent writing and critical skills of students, I offer up an educational exercise that refocuses relationship between media and critical theory. Although I work in sociology and criminology, these basic principles apply across curriculum. Theories and Tactics I begin by showing students that language does not function as a clear pane of glass to an objective, taken-for-granted world. Rather, language how people perceive and react to their world. To illustrate, I draw on Benjamin Lee Whorf's linguistic analysis of non-Western cultures. In its weaker form, Sapir-Whorf hypothesis argues that language shapes perception. stronger form claims that language constitutes ground for how we perceive the real. For example, Whorf reports that Inuit of Alaska have twenty-one words for types of snowflakes, as well as other words for wet and powdery snow and snow with different crystalline patterns. Conversely, Whorf shows that Hopi language has no word for denoting a separate self, an I. Instead, Hopi self is part of an ongoing and non-linear temporal event. Enlightenment idea of the individual who is uniquely endowed with choice--a notion central idea to postmodern capitalist democracies--is alien to Hopi language, perception, thought, and action (216). Students, then, apply this insight to their own language by asking questions about how local discourses shape what is seeable, speakable and doable. process should lead them to ask how they have come to know what they know, and how discourses simultaneously enable and constrain thought and behavior. activity is an unannounced exercise in epistemological reflexivity. In S/Z, Roland Barthes discusses how, when a denotation fixes a dominant or primary meaning, result is often ruse or even fraud. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,281
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,378

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,035
Tête enseignante GPT0,283
Écart entre enseignants0,248 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAcademic exchange quarterlyMême sujetLiteracy, Media, and EducationTravaux en français237 207