Exploring the Relationship between HSV-2/HIV Co-Infection and Health-Related Quality of Life of Adult HIV-Positive Women: A Mixed Methods Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: The life-time prevalence ofHSV-2 is higher in people infected with HIV/AIDS compared to the general population. Little is known about the experiences of women living with these two chronic sexually transmitted viral infections (STVIs), for example, whether HSV-21 HIV co-infection complicates women's experiences and influences their perceived health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The degree to which HSV-2/HIV co-infection changes perceived physical and mental HRQoL ofHIV-positive women when taking into account other factors related to HRQoL including the degree of immunosuppression, demographic characteristics, and co-existent psychological issues is not known. It has not been investigated whether these two chronic STVIs create additional challenges in social and sexual relationships for women. It is also not understood if body image or self-esteem are complicated by HSV-2IHIV co-infection, as well as how women perceive and experience disclosure in relationships and stigma. No quantitative or qualitative studies have explored these phenomena in a Canadian HIVpositive female population. Methods: This mixed methods study explored the association between HIVI HSV-2 coinfection and physical and mental HRQoL of adult HIV -positive women. A sequential exploratory model was utilized, which involved collecting qualitative data after a quantitative phase. In the first quantitative phase, a cross-sectional questionnaire was administered, HSV -2 sero-status was determined and clinical correlates and HRQoL scores were analyzed using multivariable methods. The second qualitative phase was conducted to further explain the quantitative findings; participants' views of the relationship between symptomatic HSV-2 and HIV co-infection and HRQoL were explored. The qualitative phase employed an interpretive phenomenological philosophy and methodology. Quantitative Findings: Although women's HRQoL scores on general and HIV-specific measures differed depending on their HSV-2 sero-status, place of origin, receipt of antiretroviral therapy, etc., HSV-2/HIV co-infected women did not have significantly different HRQoL scores compared to women infected with HIV alone. This conclusion was drawn on the basis of only fair goodness-of-fit of the linear regression models. HSV -2 sero-positivity predicting a better perceived physical and mental HRQoL was also considered biologically implausible and divergent with the literature. Qualitative Findings: The participant narratives highlighted the meaning that women ascribe to living with HIV and HSV-2 in relationship to their perceived HRQoL. HIV was something that affected their global physical and mental HRQoL; it was associated with a social and historical context and was mapped onto their life trajectories. HSV-2, on the other hand, was an immediate concern experienced on an episodic basis, and was more relevant to dimensions of HRQoL such as day-to-day physical and social functioning, as well as intimacy and relationships with partners. HSV-2 infection was a separate, dominant and gendered medical condition that compounded and complicated women's experiences with HIV. Main implication: HRQoL assessments from the perspective of patients will become increasingly important as life-prolonging antiretroviral treatments are refined and clinicians and HIV -positive individuals look to maximize quality oflife and well-being. As people living with HIV I AIDS continue to face complex health-related challenges, it is essential to incorporate HRQoL into treatment and care planning. It is important for service providers to account for HSV -2 as an important medical and psychosocial issue and to discuss with their clients how HSV -2 may affect perceived HRQoL. This study adds to the body of knowledge regarding women's experiences living with HN, but adds an important layer regarding co-infections and co-morbidities, which are relevant to developing an understanding of women's sexual health.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».