MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W853191667

Global Metropolitan Regions in Asia and the Challenge for Governance

2014· article· en· W853191667 sur OpenAlex
Qian Zhu

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueTown Planning Review · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueEconomic Zones and Regional Development
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMetropolitan areaContext (archaeology)Political scienceCorporate governanceEast AsiaPublic administrationEconomic growthLibrary scienceChinaGeographyLawManagement
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The APSA 20th Anniversary Congress, Taipei, 1-3 November 2013The 12th International Congress of APSA (the Asian Planning Schools Associa- tion), celebrating the Association's 20th anniversary, was held at the National Taiwan University, Taipei, from 1st to 3rd November 2013. The congress hosted participants from seventeen countries, including seven from beyond Asia: Australia, Belgium, Canada, Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom and the United States. The theme of the congress was global metropolitan regions in Asia and their governance challenges; overall, 150 papers grouped into ten sub-themes were presented and discussed.The congress was inaugurated by retrospective remarks from the APSA Presi- dent, Yukio Nishimura. He recalled that the first International Congress of City and Regional Planning Schools/Departments of Asian Universities was held in Tokyo, Japan, in 1991. During that meeting, the representatives from the fifteen Asian planning schools discussed planning education and practice in Asia; the common opinion being that Asian planning schools should develop their own planning theories and methods specifically for Asian cities, rather than relying upon Western approaches. At that time, it was agreed that the Asian Planning Schools Association should be established to provide a forum for idea development and exchange. Two years later, in 1993, Hong Kong hosted the second congress, during which the Asian Planning Schools Associa- tion was officially established. The 2013 International Congress of Asian Planning Schools Association in Taipei thus marked the 20th anniversary of APSA as a separate international academic society.The context for the congressReflecting its location, many of the keynote and sponsored talks at the 2013 congress focused on planning and development in Taiwan, beginning with a keynote speech entitled 'Experiments in democratic planning - Taiwan 1987-2013', delivered by John K. C. Liu (Building and Planning Research Foundation, National Taiwan University). Liu argued that Taiwan is an ongoing experiment in many ways - culture, economy, politics, arts and society. An example of this is the turbulent geo-politics, which needs to consider an indigenous population of approximately half a million people; within the forum of planning, Taiwan plans to develop land use regulations that are more suitable for indigenous land uses.Since 1987, momentum has been growing for a new phase of experimental democ- racy, leading to free speech and general elections. Against this backdrop, Taiwan started to address the issue of democratic planning in 1988, which includes planning for cultural democracy to address cultural variation and the needs of indigenous peoples. For instance, community-based decision-making has been suggested to balance the interests of the privileged and the poor and help counter the dominant top-down process in governance. In addition, there is concern about the integration of Asian values with Western forms of democracy, including the notions of public rights and justice. Democratic planning in Taiwan and Asia aims to protect both private and public rights, as well as to uphold social equity and justice. From the educational and professional training perspective, Liu maintained that the goal of training profes- sional generalists is of key importance, with cross-disciplinary collaboration being considered essential in moving towards democratic planning. Liu presented several intriguing cases of democratic planning practice in Taiwan. For instance, Pu-yu New Town Plan was presented as a case for democratic planning that respects local Hakka culture and landscape. Another example was the protest against soaring housing costs and its consequences in 1990. In total, Liu proposed four basic principles for democratic planning: professional generalists; cross-disciplinary collaboration; social equity and justice; as well as public participation.The congress themesThe main theme of the congress was global metropolitan regions in Asia and their challenges for governance. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,830
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,338

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,045
Tête enseignante GPT0,262
Écart entre enseignants0,217 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle