MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W855953833

In Memoriam: Leslie Field (1926-2012)

2012· article· en· W855953833 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joseph Bentz

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œThomas Wolfe review · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican Sports and Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGeniusStyle (visual arts)CriticismHistoryBiographyClassicsLiteratureSociologyArt historyArt
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Leslie Field, an influential Thomas Wolfe scholar and a longtime professor of American literature at Purdue University, died 22 June 2012, at age 85. A revered member of Thomas Wolfe Society, Les was known as a mentor and encourager of younger Wolfe scholars. [ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] In Wolfe circles, one of books for which he is best known is Thomas Wolfe: Three Decades of Criticism, which he edited in 1968. This essay collection is still widely quoted by scholars and students. It introduces readers to classic articles Wolfe's major themes, such as loneliness, South, and Wolfe's increasing social awareness. It also includes articles that give varying perspectives Wolfe's controversial style, such as Bernard DeVoto's oft-cited Genius Is Not Enough. In his introduction to this book, Les explains that one of his goals in presenting essays was to defend Wolfe against critical stereotypes that had built up around his work: One becomes somewhat weary of fashionable remarks which dismiss Wolfe in one or another of stereotyped ways: he wrote only autobiography; his writing is formless; he is a thoughtless juvenile; and so on (xx). Those controversies have remained remarkably consistent over years, and Les's collection has remained steadily relevant. Another of Les's many contributions to Wolfe studies was his editing of Wolfe's 1938 Purdue speech called Writing and Living, which was not published until 1964. Les worked with William Braswell to piece together this address, which Wolfe had delivered just four months before his death, from manuscripts found at University of North Carolina's Wilson Library and at Harvard's Houghton Library. In 1983 Les put that speech and Wolfe's The Story of a Novel into a volume titled The Autobiography of an American Novelist (Harvard University Press). Les's final book Wolfe was Thomas Wolfe and His Editors: Establishing a True Text for Posthumous Publications (1987), in which Les largely defends Edward Aswell's editing of Wolfe's posthumous works. He writes: This study should once and for all dispel myth that Thomas Wolfe's posthumous publications were written by his last editor, Edward C. Aswell. Internal evidence and newly discovered letters prove that Wolfe was writer, Aswell editor: posthumous publications are authentic Wolfe works. (xii) Les dedicated Thomas Wolfe and His Editors to his wife, Joyce. At his death, they had been married for more than fifty-nine years. She collaborated with him a number of writing projects, including two books Bernard Malamud. The first Wolfe novel Les owned, Look Homeward, Angel, came from Joyce when two of them were students at Wayne State University. In his final book Les says of her, the debt goes far beyond possible payment for an inexpensive edition of Look Homeward, Angel. For years we read, studied, and shared Thomas Wolfe. By time I wrote a master's thesis Wolfe I could no longer distinguish her ideas from mine (xvi). The Fields have a daughter, Lynda; a son and daughter-in-law, Jeffrey and Cathy; and two grandsons, Dylan and Collin. Leslie Field was born in Canada in 1926 and became a naturalized U.S. citizen in 1953. He taught at Purdue University from 1956 to 1991. Personal Reflections Leslie Field I had good fortune to have Les Field as my PhD advisor at Purdue, where I completed my dissertation Thomas Wolfe in 1991. My connection with Les was a highlight of my time in graduate school and a key turning point in my career, but it almost didn't happen. When I arrived at Purdue as a naive 21-year-old grad student, I had never heard of Leslie Field, and I had read only a little Thomas Wolfe. The English Department was big--dozens of faculty members and 150 graduate students--so we never met most of English faculty unless they happened to teach our particular courses. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,053
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,176

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,009
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,002
Communication savante0,0060,006
Science ouverte0,0020,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0060,010
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0530,041

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,029
Tête enseignante GPT0,265
Écart entre enseignants0,237 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue˜The œThomas Wolfe reviewMême sujetAmerican Sports and LiteratureTravaux en français237 207