MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W883824673

The Meaning of Work among Nonstandard Workers: A Multifaceted Reality/Le Sens Du Travail Chez Des Travailleurs Atypiques: Une Réalité Aux Multiples Facettes

2013· article· fr· W883824673 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Charles Bujold, Geneviève Fournier, Lise Lachance

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy · 2013
Typearticle
Languefr
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueEmployment and Welfare Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCasualMeaning (existential)PhenomenonSociologyWork (physics)Term (time)PsychologySocial psychologyEpistemologyPolitical sciencePhilosophyLawEngineering
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The changes that have occurred in the work world and their ensuing consequences have been one of the most socially important themes in the scientific on work. The career trajectories of many workers are no longer linear, predictable, and long-term in that they now take place in a rapidly evolving global economy that induces changes and turbulence in work environments and organizations (Herr, as cited by Burnett, 2010). At the individual level, these changes are expressed through, among other things, the emergence of nonstandard work.Without attempting to achieve a uniformity that would partially obscure the nature of nonstandard work, it is worthwhile to clarify the meaning at- tributed to this term. Tucker (2002) reported that the notion of nonstandard work designates a part-time, nonpermanent job, but that definitions vary from one country to another. The term peripheral workers was used in reference to people employment is contingent, free-lance, temporary, external, part-time, and casual (Savickas et al., 2009, p. 241). As Dupuis and McLaren (2006) observed, the fact that workers can hold more than one job at a time can complicate the situation. By combining different analysis perspectives, Fournier, Bourassa, and Beji (2003) associated nonstandard work with employment whose length was limited or uncertain and whose status was either poorly or not at all defined. This phenomenon is sizable, as noted by Goguel d'allondans (2005), who, in his reflections on the metamorphosis of the work world, evoked the breaking up of the social body into three categories, namely employees with stable jobs, those with precarious jobs, and those excluded from the labour market.Echoing ideas put forward by Richardson (1993), who underlined the importance of studying the reality of work in people's lives, Blustein (2006) stated that there has been a notable lack of attention to the inner motivations, personal constructions, and the way in which people make meaning of working in the literature (p. 66), and suggested that, if we are to understand this reality, it is imperative to examine the situations of people who have little or no control over the work-related choices they make. Accordingly, we believe it is important to comprehend the meaning that nonstandard workers attribute to work, considering the difficulty they have in keeping their jobs.The exploratory study presented here was part of a larger research program focusing on career trajectories characterized by unstable employment (Bujold & Fournier, 2008; Fournier & Bujold, 2005; Fournier, Lachance, & Bujold, 2009). In line with Blustein's (2006) suggestion, our study set out to determine the meaning of work in the eyes of workers who had been in a nonstandard work situation for at least three years. We examined this meaning by looking at four aspects: the significance the workers attributed to work, work's absolute and relative centrality for them, their expectations of it, and their representation of their personal commitment to work. This article presents the review as it applies to the variables, methodology, and results of our study.UTE RATURE REVIEWThe four aspects mentioned above are examined at the conceptual and empirical levels with regard to work in general and to nonstandard work in particular. Furthermore, work by Mercure and Vultur (2010), which deals with both of these two categories, will be discussed at the end of this section.SignificanceBased on her examination of various studies on the subject, Morin (2004) drew out six characteristics of significant work. Significant work (a) is useful, (b) is morally justifiable, (c) allows people to benefit from their accomplishments, (d) allows individuals to carry out socially acknowledged tasks, (e) is self-sufficient, and (f) permits the establishment of gratifying relationships with one's colleagues. The latter two characteristics were also mentioned by Blustein (2006), who spoke more of the functions of work than of its significance. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,007
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,013
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,039

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0070,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0130,055
Communication savante0,0110,011
Science ouverte0,0020,007
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,044
Tête enseignante GPT0,316
Écart entre enseignants0,272 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Journal of Counselling and PsychotherapyMême sujetEmployment and Welfare StudiesTravaux en français237 207