MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W89499141

Science Fiction & Scientific Literacy: Incorporating Science Fiction Reading in the Science Classroom

2006· article· en· W89499141 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Science Teacher · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueScience Education and Perceptions
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésReading (process)Scientific literacySpace (punctuation)Science educationDistrustCurriculumLiteracyMathematics educationSociologyComputer scienceMedia studiesEpistemologyPsychologyPedagogyLawPolitical sciencePhilosophy
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The term has become synonymous, in the media at least, for any discovery in too incredible or unexpected for the nonscientist to imagine. This without a doubt annoys many scientists because the fiction label has the popular connotations of willingly false or misleading. This image also bothers those who know that in good the science is often to be taken seriously. One of the most common classroom uses of is for students to pick out flaws in movies or television shows. Unfortunately, in my experience, this approach can result in students who come to distrust anything that sounds like science. Science has so much more to offer in terms of good and how works, while at the same time addressing the basics of literacy. Take, for instance, short such as A Man's Place, by aerospace engineer Eric Choi, originally published in Space Inc. (2003). This short story, like all of the stories in the book, focuses on and the future of work in orbit or outer space. [Editor's note: Teachers can read this story at www.sciencenewsforkids.org/pages/scifizone/choi.asp.] Another good example is The Cold Equation by Tom Godwin (2000) that looks at the unalterable and potentially tragic constraints of space travel. These show why is an ideal medium for exploring issues in and society. In this article I make a case for why should be a part of curricula and I provide an all-purpose activity to help teachers use in the classroom. The opportunity for literacy skills Science is read not only for enjoyment, but because it digs into scientific concepts with imagination, creativity, and a thorough appreciation of consequence. Most authors ask, What if? and speculate about what could happen if a certain aspect of or technology existed--or did not exist. By bringing into the realm of individual lives as well as entire cultures, these stories are thought experiments about anything we can imagine, from global warming to evolution. In the past, stories, with few exceptions, have been viewed as little more than entertainment for young readers, something to whet the appetite for real books later in life or to encourage a reluctant student. But they can do much more. I have worked to incorporate into curriculum with experts at many levels including the Wright Center for Innovations in Science Education, Wayne State University, Pennsylvania Science Teachers Association, and Science Teachers of Ontario. In many cases individuals most comfortable with the flood of new technologies and scientific discoveries and most able to see past the novelty to the potential for good or ill, have been prepared by their choice of literature. We are living in a world that seems fictional, and readers have the advantage of knowing the terrain. This is true because stories, particularly the short form readily available in Year's Best anthologies in libraries (Hartwell 2005; Dozois 2005), speculate from known concepts. The authors of these stories ask: What if this happens? What if that continues or even stops? From this start, good stories do not violate scientific principles, but rely on them to guide thought experiments through to possible consequence. Good is story, science, and speculation all wrapped up in a package custom-made for improving literacy and critical-thinking skills--it does not get more convenient. Literacy concerns the communicating of ideas from one mind to another, including component skills such as vocabulary, language structure, reading, and writing to elicit comprehension. Critical thinking blends with literacy in the interpretation and extrapolation of ideas. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,043
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche, Bibliométrie, Études des sciences et des technologies, Communication savante, Science ouverte
Catégories consensuellesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,888
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0430,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0030,044
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0130,047
Communication savante0,0050,006
Science ouverte0,0060,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,059
Tête enseignante GPT0,386
Écart entre enseignants0,327 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle