Factors Causing Work Life Imbalance among Working Women-A Study on School Teachers
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction One of the major changes anticipated in the labor markets in India is the entry of women professionals into different sectors. Indian family has traditionally granted a favored status to men as a chief breadwinner (Awasthy & Gupta, 2001). The socialization at work, great work environments, flexi time and facilities make many employees to spend more time at office and enjoy the time (Sandeep Krishnan, 2011). Grzywacz Butter (2005) tested some propositions, relating to work family facilitation finding that resource -rich jobs enable work to family facilitation. The relationship between domain satisfaction (e.g. job, family, marriage) and life satisfaction have given a very great scope (Beutell, 2006). There are contradictory role expectations from women while at work and at home. On professional front women are expected to be sweet, soft, sensitive, adaptable, gentle, and unassertive and domesticated (Misra, 1998). A healthy balance between work and non-work life keeps an individual motivated and engaged. Hence, maintaining a balance between work and non-work life is crucial and a matter of strategic concern to the employers as well as employees (Baral & Bhargava, 2009). Literature Review Over the last decade work life balance has become a significant issue for both employees and employers. Work and personal life are mutually dependent and play an integral part in an individual's life. There is a growing recognition by policymakers of the importance of supporting women in juggling work and family life (Maria, Glaser & Henz, 2002). But, the woman who enters occupations traditionally reserved for males have to struggle, face many difficulties to create place for her and prove her worth (Roe & Siegelman, 1964). However, it must be recognized that in Indian society the new and expanded role of women with a strong occupational identity is putting a lot of pressure on women's time and energy (Adya, 2008). Work-life imbalance was not only a source of concern, but also that it was the major source of dissatisfaction for participants. Furthermore, it is also observed that there is a clear connection between problems with work-life balance and withdrawal behaviours, including turnover and non-genuine sick absence (Hughes & Bozionelos, 2007). In a national study on work life conflicts in Canada in 2001, one in four Canadians reported that their work responsibilities interfered with the ability to fulfill their responsibilities at home (Duxbury & Higgins, 2003). Family care commitment and work intensification are the two major sources of work life conflicts (Cooke & Jing, 2009). Those who are young and single tend to have less work life conflict issues compared with those who have childcare and elderly care responsibilities (Chen, 2006). Study conducted by Allen (2000) states that the conflict results in dissatisfaction, depression and bad physical health. The work-family conflicts have been conceptualized as an individual's orientation across different life roles, an inter role phenomenon (Marks & MacDermid, 1996), 'satisfaction and good functioning at work and at home with a minimum of role conflict' (Campbell-Clark, 2000), and 'a satisfying, healthy and productive life that includes work, play and love, that integrates a range of life activities with attention to self and to personal and spiritual development, and that expresses a person's unique wishes, interests, and values'(Kofodimos, 1984; Shaffer, Francesco, Joplin & Lau, 2003). Work life imbalance is a major concern for all the people. Employees experience imbalance in their work and life due to the role conflicts, employment pressures, multiple roles, domestic responsibilities, child care, nature and attitude of superior and family members, competition etc. The literature also reveals that there are scanty studies for work life imbalance towards school teachers. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».