Chapter Nine: Quests and Questions of Consciousness: Margaret Atwood's Post-Human Futures
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Literary studies highlight the importance of studying works of art in connection with their location and socio-historical settings, yet what must also be considered is the impact the work has on the consciousness of the reader or audience. The local and the global must be considered in terms of consciousness, together with the possibility of these consciousnesses being changed or augmented, a concept that encourages the possibility of evolution towards a higher level of interaction with the global population as well as with the natural environment. The concept of transnationalism-which implicates the connection between individual and collective consciousnessalready emphasizes the placement of identity being defined as beyond and independent of boundaries of nation or race. According to postcolonial theory, the present is always embedded in the re-memory of the past: new worlds cannot be created unless incorporating a telling knowledge of the old. Thus, we remember the future. While being based on an informed and critical memory of the past, Utopias in the imagination are also necessary for providing upcoming hope. They are crucial as critical points of opposition to oppression. New worlds, brave or not, must be created as parallel realities to address and challenge current creations of self and other, subject and object, friend and alien. As Lyman Tower Sargent postulates: dissatisfaction is the beginning of utopianism, and ultimately, utopianism is about the transformation of everyday life (2010:49).This chapter addresses issues of new Otherness and argues that we need to look more closely at how the shifting concepts of human kind (with both biological and ethical dimensions) are constructed in the contexts of both literature and life. Feminists throughout the twentieth century developed interests in the possibility of apocalyptic endings to the current known civilizations of the world, and project possible future disasters, either through war or devastating pandemics. The notion of consciousness must be asserted as not merely negotiable within that future, but crucial if there is to be a survival of our world. Margaret Atwood-despite claiming that 'human, however, does not necessarily mean 'wonderful' (1994: 132)-provides a challenging new map of humanity and contributes to the crucial debate on what it means to be in a post-human world.Margaret Atwood and the problematic search for new worldsThe Canadian author Margaret Atwood's novels have formed a central core of the exploration of women's consciousness in twentieth and twenty-first century literature. They challenge gendered roles in western culture through an unleashing of consciousness as a weapon for social change. Her novel, Alias Grace, for example accesses factual records of historical characters to problematise the ambiguities of deciphering history and truth, through the medium of female language. While being a novel that tries to deconstruct the notion of a woman's madness, Alias Grace continues to formulate a feminist aesthetic based on alternatives to logical male order. Even from the multi-optional viewpoints of one woman's life, new possibilities of analysing consciousness seem to be involved in this model. New language opens up the possibility for dynamic rewriting of reality. The language of writers, such as Margaret Atwood, often reflects a profound intuitive insight-one that goes beyond the normal surface level of words-to tap into a more subtle level of knowledge that augments the reader's receptive experience.This chapter examines three of Margaret Atwood's works, Surfacing (1972) and the first two novels of her Maddaddam trilogy, Oryx and Crake (2003) and The Year of the Flood (2009). These novels form a trajectory in many ways, since the concerns and themes relate to contemporary issues of agency, colonialism and neo-colonialism; control and conflict; and the impact of all of these on humankind's impact on the environment. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,017 | 0,024 |
| Communication savante | 0,011 | 0,011 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,011 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».