Social Production and Reproduction at the Interfaces of Public and Private Spheres
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Social Production and Reproduction at the Interfaces of Public and Private Spheres Editors: Marcia Texler Segal, Esther Ngan-Ling Chow, and Vasilike Demos Emerald: Bingley, West Yorkshire, 2012, 302 pp. ISBN 978-1-78052-874-8Social Production and Reproduction at the Interfaces of Public and Private Spheres is the 16th volume of the series of books dealing with new developments in the study of gender within a variety of feminist frameworks and methodologies under the title Advances in Gender Research reuniting authors from all over the world.In the age of globalization, the edge between the public and private spaces, whether it is about people, media, social and legal policies, relationships or behavior is dim, each of them having undergone a redefinition process under the light of modern gender issues.The volume gathers papers that explore the topic of production and reproduction at the crossroad of public and private social life in its greater depth following the natural reproduction steps as matching or making relationships, motherhood, family life and work, analyzing the issues from the perspective of gendered attitude towards different modern social policies in countries like Spain, Indonesia, Pakistan, Canada, USA, China, Taiwan, and England, exploring both rural and urban spaces.Authors address the relationship among families from different perspectives: stereotypical image of families with marriage migrants and the role of the Unification Church in constructing and normalizing heterosexuality in modern social context (Minjeong Kim, Gendered Desire and Heteronorpolitics mativity in the Transnational Matchmaking Process), the model of Chinese motherhood and its impact on the development of families enterprises in Spain underlining the destination country labor conditions that open to transnational families, households with multi-located members, thus putting in place new strategies for family balance (Amelia Saiz Lopez, Transnationalism, Motherhood, and Entrepreneur ship: Chinese Women in Spain), the role of local culture in the social reproduction of women's lives within the family and the way it relates their understanding of motherhood and sexuality to the capacity of challenging family culture bound expectations (Marilyn Porter and Kristi Poerwandari, Living Culture and Making Relationships: Mothers and Daughters Negotiate Sexuality in Indonesia and Canada). They examine the single motherhood among low-income Black women or residents of impoverished regions in Southwest China, reassessing previous quasijudgmental approaches based on stereotypes faced by mothers in poverty and discovering the cultural resources that enabled Black women to handle the burden of poverty in raising their children (Bette J. Dickerson, Wanda Parham-Payne and Tekisha Dwan Everette, Single Mothering in Poverty: Black Feminist Considerations) and investigate the interplay between Chinese patriarchal values and neoliberal ideas through introduction of techniques, by official means, to improve the godmother image and reinforce gender stereotype through market activity (Lihua Wang, Neoliberalism and the Feminization of Family Survival: the Happiness Project in Four Chinese Villages).The workplace climate is analyzed both from the perspective of the impact of China's economic transition on women's construction of their work and family roles, stressing the women's effort to cope with excessive market forces to protect family well-being rather than leaning on domestic role as a result of traditional gender values (Jiping Zuo and Yongping Jiang, Work-to-Family Conflict and Women's Construction of Work/ Family Roles in Post-Mao China) and from the high-powered occupations such as college faculty perspective, where women struggle facing the persistence of male breadwinner stereotype, seek to achieve a balance between a full-time homemaker and family life (Catherine White Berheide and Cay Anderson-Hanley, Doing It All: The Effects of Gender, Rank, and Department Climate on Work-Family Conflict for Faculty at Liberal Arts Colleges). …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».