Eve Haque. Multiculturalism within a Bilingual Framework: Language, Race and Belonging to Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Eve Haque. Multiculturalism within a Bilingual Framework: Language, Race and Belonging to Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2012. 309 pp. Notes. Bibliography. Index. $29.95 sc. This book gives a detailed account of how Canadian 1969 Official Languages Act and 1971 Multiculturalism policy emerged out of Royal Commission on Bilingualism and Biculturalism that took place across Canada in 1960s, better known as B and B Commission. The author attributes creation of B and B Commission to three mean reasons: the radical changes taking place in immigration policy, federal government's attempts to abolish Indian Act, and rise of Quebec's linguistic nationalism ... (31). In her discussion, author argues that ethnic groups other than majority Anglophone and Francophone communities, despite fact that they were invited to participate in discussion, were in fact excluded from decision-making process--as in case of Indigenous groups. These groups lacked political power vis-a-vis Anglophones and Francophones, considered, in official discourse, as races in Canada. Using methodological approach of Foucault's genealogy, where history is not understood as a continuity of events, but rather as oriented to revealing discontinuities (26), author undertook a thorough analysis of key documents from B and B Commission--the preliminary hearings and report, public hearings and research conducted in context of Commission, Book I on official languages, and Book IV on cultural contributions of other ethnic groups. Her analysis focused on role played by ethnic and indigenous groups in work of B and B Commission. Written in a very accessible style, book explores various key debates that took place during B and B Commission work. The first debate concerned use of word race to define country's founding groups (Anglophones and Francophones). The term of reference races was highly criticized by many. The word race was a source of misunderstanding, even though Commission tried to present it as a synonym for Interestingly enough, in French versions of commission's documents, this word was not used and races were rather named les deux peuples fondateurs. The author illustrates this debate by looking specifically at contributions of key individuals from Commission, as well as at those of influential representatives of diverse groups who did not agree with this term, although for different reasons. The major contribution of this book is to draw attention to profound contradiction regarding importance of language in maintenance of a culture. The B and B Commission argued that in context of two races, language was crucial in building of Canadian nation. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,012 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,016 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».