MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W946560553 · doi:10.1177/070674371506000501

Cardiac Sudden Death in Psychiatric Patients

2015· editorial· en· W946560553 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Hiroyuki Uchida, Takefumi Suzuki

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · 2015
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesJanssen PharmaceuticalsOtsuka PharmaceuticalAstellas Pharma
Mots-clésPsychiatrySudden cardiac deathMedicinePsychologyCardiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

It is unfortunate, but true, that mortality gaps between psychiatric patients and the general population remain considerably wide. While the data are not always consistent, it appears that life expectancy may be about 10 to 20 years shorter among patients with psychiatric conditions, compared with healthy people.1 Previous data have identified numerous factors contributing to the shorter life expectancy, which, apart from suicide, plausibly include increased physical morbidities.1–3 Among them, cardiac sudden death is one of the major causes of premature mortality. For example, CVDs accounted for as many as 62.8% of sudden death in 51 patients with schizophrenia in an autopsy-based study.4 Depression was also associated with a higher hazard of 3-year mortality from heart disease, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.155 among 5 078 082 patients who were treated in Veterans Health Administration settings.5 Issues in lifestyle, such as smoking, substance use, an unbalanced diet, and reduced physical activities following the onset of psychiatric illnesses may result in metabolic abnormalities, which could ultimately lead to increased risks of CVDs. In addition, various psychotropics, even newer ones, have cardiac toxicity.6,7 Those drugs more or less prolong QT intervals by blocking potassium channel, which, in turn, can result in life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, such as torsade de pointes although the risk differs substantially among the medications. In light of the risk of this potentially lethal side effect, major treatment guidelines recommend routine assessment with an ECG for patients receiving drugs with such a risk,8–10 which, however, is not always followed in clinical practice.11 Such ignorance may be attributable, at least to some extent, to a lack of knowledge and experiences with this highly important but possibly unfamiliar issue, which is a serious concern. What does QT interval represent? What is the difference between QT interval and QTc interval? Is there any difference in QT intervals between the sexes? How about the impact of age on QT intervals? It is very likely that many of us cannot promptly and accurately answer those questions, although they are all clinically relevant. Another concern is the potential impact of the concurrent use of 2 or more psychotropics or polypharmacotherapy on QT intervals. This is highly pertinent as recent prescription surveys have been consistent in demonstrating a prevalent use of psychotropic polypharmacy, irrespective of geographical regions.12–16 While polypharmacy for bipolar disorders generally seems to be supported by empirical data,17 data in favour of polypharmacy for other psychiatric conditions are still scarce and controversial at best.18 Moreover, those previous data have mainly focused on the therapeutic effects of psychotropic polypharmacy; conversely, its negative effects have not garnered wide attention thus far. In light of the possible pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions of drugs concurrently prescribed, potentially increased risks of adverse consequences of combination therapy, including QT prolongation, should be prudently considered. In the 2 In Review articles19,20 in this issue of The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, the authors have provided thorough reviews of QTc prolongation among patients with psychiatric conditions. In the first article,19 Dr Rabkin examined the impact of age and sex on QTc intervals. Dr. Rabkin is one of the most distinguished expert cardiologists and has served on many consensus conferences for the development of the best practice guidelines for physicians. First, he shares the basic knowledge on QTc, including correction methods and its association with sudden death, with which many psychiatrists may not be familiar. Then, he reviews current evidence on the effects of age and sex as well as frequently prescribed antipsychotics and antidepressants on QTc intervals in an easy-to-understand manner. In the second article,20 Dr Takeuchi and colleagues conducted a systematic review of the current literature on any potential association between antipsychotic polypharmacy and QTc prolongation. They conclude that the currently available evidence fails to unequivocally show that antipsychotic polypharmacy worsens QTc prolongation in general. However, in light of scarce and inconsistent evidence, clinicians are advised to remain conservative in resorting to antipsychotic polypharmacy as the combination of some QTc-prolongation liable antipsychotics has the potential to further prolong QTc interval. Both reviews clearly emphasize potentially serious consequences of QTc prolongation and underscore the need of timely and regular ECG assessments. This is especially true for senior patients, whose QTc is already longer than their younger counterparts. Moreover, they are likely to receive a greater number of medications for psychiatric and somatic conditions; the percentage taking more than 1 medication was 70% in people aged 65 to 79 and 3% in those aged 6 to 14, according to the Canadian Health Measures Survey that was conducted from 2007 to 2011.21 Drug-induced QTc prolongation depends on drug concentrations, which is longest at peak and shortest at trough. Given the well-described and uncharacterized risks of elevation of drug concentrations owing to interactions, polypharmacy of any sort should be avoided if at all possible unless there is a clear medical indication. While QTc intervals should be assessed in a timely and regular manner in real-world practice, psychiatrists are advised to pay attention to other well-established somatic risk factors, such as smoking, substance use, obesity, and glucose intolerance, that are detrimental to the morbidity and mortality of cardiac diseases.9 Such a comprehensive and holistic viewpoint, albeit with some realistic challenges, is useful to reduce CVDs and undesired outcomes among patients with serious mental illnesses.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,017

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,249
Écart entre enseignants0,242 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations8
Publié2015
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry→Même sujetCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias→Travaux en français237 207→