MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W94658937

Asperger Syndrome in Adolescence: Living with the Ups, the Downs, and Things in Between

2005· article· en· W94658937 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Margaret D. Weiss

Notice bibliographique

RevuePubMed Central · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueFamily and Disability Support Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPsychologyHuman sexualityAsperger syndromeFriendshipSocial psychologyDevelopmental psychologyAutismSociologyGender studies
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Adolescence presents unique challenges to individuals with Asperger’s syndrome, many of which will have escaped diagnosis in earlier years, or been misdiagnosed because of prominent attention problems, anxiety or other issues. There are excellent resources available to help parents recognize, understand and work with the key features of this disorder, such as Tony Attwood’s Asperger’s Syndrome. Individuals with Asperger’s have also written creative accounts of the internal experience of living and growing with the disorder, such as Pretending to be Normal by Liane Holliday Willey. This volume fills a different niche. First, it focuses on the issues that are paramount and unique to adolescence. Clinicians working with parents who have to deal with diagnosis during this period, and understanding why their child who managed previously, is now having so much trouble will benefit from a practical how-to appropriate to this age group. Second, this book brings together such a diverse authorship that the reader cannot help but come away with a sense of the disorder from within, from loving family and from dedicated professionals working to problem solve side by side. Third, the chapters in the book cover areas that I have not seen spoken to with such thoughtfulness anywhere else, although real life demands their attention. This includes Asperger’s and sexuality, friendship, safety, school options, siblings, disclosure, motor coordination and coping with the bittersweet news of diagnosis. These are questions I have often been asked. Having a book available that addresses each of these issues by experts in the area from occupational therapists, to private inspector and special education teachers provides a framework and structure for more thoughtful therapeutic interventions. Professionals who contributed chapters include Tony Attwood who discussed adapting Cognitive Behavior Therapy to Aspergers, Steven Gutstein who has developed Relationship Development Intervention, Isabelle Henault a sexologist, and Richard Howlin a specialist in adolescent psychology. Autobiographical contributions include the forward by a 14 year old, several adults with Asperger’s who have written and taught about the disorder, and a mother of seven special needs children among whom four have autism spectrum disorders. Three teachers, a private investigator, and an occupational therapist all add perspectives on assisting with learning, safety and leisure activities. The authorship represents the USA, Canada, Australia, and the UK: in itself a testament to the solidarity of the research community around this disorder and the gains we have made. The chapters vary, as is always the case in an edited book. I did not expect to agree with everything in every chapter and I did not. I could recommend this book to patients and therapists alike as a useful tool to find strategies that would help, without necessarily recommending it as something that need be swallowed whole. Overall the reading level of the book is high, but not out of reach of educated consumers. Nor is the information provided so simplistic that any good clinician will not pick up new insights and awareness. This is a difficult balance to strike and I was impressed that the task was possible and accomplished.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,017
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,307

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,272
Écart entre enseignants0,250 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2005
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePubMed CentralMême sujetFamily and Disability Support ResearchTravaux en français237 207