The Structure of ladies' figure skating short program in 2010 Olympic Games
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The purpose of this work was to examine senior ladies short program element structure which was skated at the Winter Olympic Games in Vancouver 2010. The study covers all 30 skaters that were qualified for the Games. \nTheory part scratches the surface of demands to become a top athlete and continues with the demands of the program in rule wise and represents the new judging system of figure skating and how it has brought new demands to the sport. The research part is defining structure of ladies short program focusing on tactical side; is there any common laws among top skaters to build programs and are there any structural differences between the champion and the number 30 or are there any differences in timing/placing the elements that succeeded or didn’t were couple of ultimate questions when starting to do this study. \nSkaters 1-15 had a quite the same program structure with only minor differences on elements. They mainly tried to perform the hardest jump elements on a first two elements and then have a small “breathing break” before double axel, the last two spins and step sequence which is quite physical to perform with the new judging system. Most of the mistakes happened among the hardest and most valuable jumps. \nSkaters 16-30 mainly opened with easier jump and then did all the jumps in a row. They did mistakes through the program and also with spins which should be “the easy ones” from element list to perform with good quality. Also the program structure differed quite a lot compared to best 15 skaters. \nThe higher ranked skaters were able not just to perform with good quality harder and more valuable elements, they also planned to do totally different caliber elements than e.g. skaters ranked 20-30. On many element, skaters lost too much points considering the base value and it is reasonable to present the hypothesis to plan the program according to skill level of the skaters’ normal, everyday skill level, not according to what it might take to qualify for free skating at the certain event. By doing this, the chances to qualify for free skating increases because of higher grade of execution (GOE) values that seem to be the key factor to earn highest score from the performance in today’s figure skating.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».