A conversational intervention procedure as a tool for improving and evaluating narrative skills : A study of 5-to-8 years old French children.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
By age five children have acquired basic narrative skills and are able to report events temporally framed within a narrative structure. However, at least when they have to produce autonomous narratives on the basis of images, until 8-9 years many children have difficulties in telling coherent and causally-motivated stories, particularly when the internal states of the characters and a mentalistic understanding of the world are involved. The aim of this study is to contribute further results concerning the role of a dialogical intervention procedure soliciting children's attention on the reasons of the events of a on children's production of complex mind-oriented narratives. To this effect, 140 French-speaking children aged 5 to 8 years (35 children at each age level) followed an experimental procedure devised in earlier studies. They were first exposed to five pictures (the story whose main point is a misunderstanding between two characters) presented sequentially. After the pictures had been removed, all children were requested to tell the experimenter the (first narrative). Then, 25 children at each age level were asked questions soliciting the reasons of the key events in the (the conversation group) while the other 10 (the control group) played a memory game with the pictures and other similar cards. Then, all children were asked to narrate once again the (second narrative). One week later children were asked to tell the a third time (to test the stability of the eventual changes obtained immediately afterwards) and to tell a new analogous to the stone (to test the generalization power of the conversational intervention). Narrative skills were analyzed for causal and evaluative relations (explanations, internal states, false beliefs and overall coherence). Results show that from age six on, the conversation group improved, significantly more then the control group, the overall coherence and mind-oriented causal plot of the in their second narrative. A relation between improvements and success in ToM tasks is observed. Results also show stability and generalization of the changes confirming the importance of the conversational intervention in improving the coherence of children's narratives and its usefulness as an assessment tool.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».