MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W96844495

Public Health: SARS update

2003· article· en· W96844495 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
John Hoey

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2003
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineEpidemiologyCoronavirusSuspectDiseaseSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)VirusRespiratory systemPublic healthPediatricsVirologyInfectious disease (medical specialty)Internal medicinePathology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background and epidemiology: Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) continues to spread around the world. As we write, over 3200 cases have been officially reported from 23 countries. Case reports from Health Canada make a distinction between “suspect” and “probable” cases based on the progression from mild respiratory symptoms to severe respiratory illness in patients with known or possible exposure to the disease. As of Apr. 16, there were 303 suspected or probable cases reported from 6 provinces (Fig. 1, left), although most (249) were in Ontario. Hong Kong, which reports only probable cases, listed 1268 SARS cases as of Apr. 16 (Fig. 1, right). China has been slow to release total figures, and the most recent report of 1432 is likely an underestimate. Fig. 1: Cumulative reported cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Canadian data (left) include both suspect and probable cases (defined using WHO case definitions). Hong Kong data (right) include probable cases only. [Source: www.sars.ca ... The WHO has confirmed that a coronavirus, now named SARS virus, is the cause. Coronaviruses were previously thought to cause only mild disease in immunocompetent people (2 members of the coronavirus family cause the common cold), although it is responsible for a variety of illnesses in animals. The most recent molecular testing suggests that the SARS virus is a new infectious agent.1 A study involving 50 patients with probable SARS in Hong Kong revealed that 45 (90%) showed either antibodies to this novel virus in a serum sample, or viral RNA detection in nasopharyngeal aspirates or stools. Serum samples taken during the acute and convalescent phases of the illness were available for 32 of these 50 patients; all showed evidence of seroconversion.2 When specific antibody testing was done in 280 control serum samples, obtained from blood donors and patients with respiratory and other disease, no antibody to the suspect virus was found. As previously reported in this column,3 SARS is thought to have arisen in the fall of 2002 in Guangdong Province, China, before being diagnosed for the first time in March 2003, in a nephrologist in Hong Kong. The first Canadian case occurred in a 78-year-old woman who, before her diagnosis in Toronto, had stayed on the same floor of a hotel in Hong Kong as the nephrologist.4 Before her illness was diagnosed, she had transmitted the disease to members of her household, including her 44-year-old son and his wife. Although symptomatic, these 2 people sought care from a family physician, who became infected. From these first cases, infection spread quickly. Clinical management: The case definition previously reported3 is still in effect. There are no serologic tests or other methods of laboratory diagnosis, although RNA primers are available for gene amplification testing (www.who.int/csr/sars/primers/en), and a team at British Columbia's Genome Sciences Centre has published the genetic sequence of the SARS virus (www.bcgsc.ca/bioinfo/SARS), which will pave the way to the development of a sensitive and specific test. Clinical data have been published on 208 cases of SARS2,4,5,6 (Table 1). Of the reported cases, 20 (9.6%) died by the time of publication. This mortality rate is higher than that reported in Hong Kong as of Apr. 16 (4.8% of declared cases), and about the same as the rate reported in Canada as of that date (9.5% of probable cases). [These figures are fluctuating daily, as the numbers given in our Editorial,7 posted Apr. 16, illustrate (see page 1229).] Table 1 To date, treatment has consisted mainly of broad-spectrum antibiotics, corticosteroids and intravenous ribavirin.8 As yet, no SARS treatment protocols have been evaluated in clinical trials. Prevention and control: Patients who meet the case definition of suspect or probable SARS should be monitored closely and isolated either in hospital or at home. (This decision should be made in conjunction with local public health officials.) Caregivers of probable and suspect cases should use standard isolation and infection-control techniques (masks, gowns and gloves). Hospitals in Ontario and elsewhere where cases have been reported have implemented tight controls on the entry of patients, staff and visitors. In Ontario, this has meant asking all staff, volunteers and visitors to be screened using a standard questionnaire and, when indicated, a measure of body temperature. Travel advisories are being updated frequently and are available at www.sars.gc.ca and www.cdc.gov/ncidod/sars. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) advises that people planning elective or nonessential travel to mainland China, Hong Kong, Singapore, and Hanoi, Vietnam, consider postponing their trips until further notice. Because there is no evidence of widespread community transmission in this country, to date the CDC has not advised against travel to or from Canada. James Maskalyk John Hoey CMAJ β See related articles pages 1245, 1259, 1265 and 1289

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,048
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,162

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0050,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0020,003
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0480,022

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,084
Tête enseignante GPT0,407
Écart entre enseignants0,323 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2003
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Medical Association Journal→Même sujetCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies→Travaux en français237 207→