MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W97555037

'No Passion at the Palavela:' Sonia Bianchetti Garbato and Figure Skating's New Judging System

2006· article· en· W97555037 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elizabeth A. Hanley

Notice bibliographique

RevueProceedings: International Symposium for Olympic Research · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueSports Analytics and Performance
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDemisePassionGloomAsideTest (biology)NewspaperHistoryLawAdvertisingMedia studiesPolitical scienceArtPsychologySociologyLiteratureSocial psychology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

One of the most controversial changes in the history of Olympic figure skating made its debut at the Torino Olympic Winter Games in February 2006. Not since the demise of compulsory figures in 1990 after the World Championships in Halifax, Canada, had there been such a dramatic change. This time it was the judging system that was totally overhauled. What prompted the change was the judging scandal in the pairs figure skating competition at the 2002 Olympic Winter Games in Salt Lake City. The familiar 6.0 system was cast aside for what has become known as the NJS, or New Judging System, eerily similar to that used in another subjective sport, artistic gymnastics. From athletes to spectators, the NJS is clearly more complicated, less 'user-friendly,' and simply put, results in a mathematical statistic--but is it more fair? Can it eliminate corruption? Has it stifled artistic expression and creativity? These questions will be addressed in this paper, citing opinions from two Olympic judges and relevant newspaper articles containing comments from former and current athletes. The NJS was approved by the International Skating Union (ISU) in 2004 and implemented for figure skating competitions during the 2004-2006 seasons leading up to the Olympic Winter Games scheduled for February 2006 in the Palavela Arena, Torino's figure skating venue. was in Torino that the real test for the NJS occurred. In one person's opinion, at least, the test failed. One of the most vocal critics of the NJS was Sonia Bianchetti Garbato, an Italian involved at all levels of figure skating for 40 years. was obvious that, for her, the NJS had failed miserably. Sonia Bianchetti Garbato: an Honest Rebel In her recent book, Cracked Ice, Sonia Garbato details the politics, controversies, and problems that have plagued figure skating over the years. is obvious in the book that she is proud of her 'trailblazing' efforts in establishing a program of educational seminars for judges, eliminating compulsory figures, and working for fairness and honesty in judging. Garbato simply states, It must have been my destiny to be the first woman in the I was the first to be elected to the Figure Skating Technical Committee, as a member and then as the chair person; the first to be appointed as a referee in an ISU championship, with authority over the judges on my panel; and the first to be elected to the Council, the powerful top governing body of the ISU. (1) Judging and refereeing at several championships, including World Championships and seven Olympic Winter Games, has earned Garbato the credentials and expertise to speak her mind regarding the ISU and its ongoing politics. In her book she relates, for example, a personal experience with an Austrian ISU member. During the 1964 European Championships, the ISU member requested her to award high marks to an Austrian skater in the compulsory figures in order for him to reach the medal podium. As a new ISU member, judging at her first ISU championships, Garbato was shocked and confused. Not knowing if she should tell anyone about this, she judged honestly and ignored the request. In the end, the Austrian skater did not perform well enough to reach the podium. A similar situation occurred in 1965 at the World Championships where Garbato was again a judge. The same Austrian skater again received honest marks from her. At the conclusion of the competition, it was evident that the Austrian officials realized that Sonia Garbato was not one with whom to 'cut a deal.' None of the Austrian officials spoke to her at the conclusion of the competition; however, she was never again approached by anyone regarding dishonest actions. (2) Apparently, the message she sent was clear. In her introduction to Cracked Ice, the well-known Olympic coach from 1976-2002, Tatiana Tarasova of Russia, applauded Garbato: was not in favor of Americans or Russians. She was in favor of skating as a branch of art. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,703
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,572

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,039
Tête enseignante GPT0,281
Écart entre enseignants0,241 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueProceedings: International Symposium for Olympic ResearchMême sujetSports Analytics and PerformanceTravaux en français237 207