MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W97793896

GLOBAL ORDER AND THE FUTURE OF THE EURO

2004· article· en· W97793896 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anna J. Schwartz

Notice bibliographique

RevueCato Journal · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueGlobal Financial Crisis and Policies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCurrencyEconomicsOrder (exchange)Foreign direct investmentPosition (finance)Investment (military)International tradeChinaEconomyInternational economicsPolitical scienceFinanceMonetary economicsMacroeconomics
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The performance of the euro can be assessed in relation to recent developments in the global economy as well as in relation to the vision of the architects of the European Monetary Union. I shall consider both perspectives and ask whether the EMU has lived up to the vision of its architects to create a new currency to serve as a bulwark for maintaining price stability over the medium term. The Euro in the Global Economy In a study for the National Bureau of Economic Research, Michael Dooley, David Folkerts-Landau, and Peter Garber (2003) describe recent developments in the global economy as attributable to the behavior patterns of countries in three geographical areas. The United States is one of the geographical areas. It is the center country of the global economy, and the system's financial intermediary. It does not manage its exchange rate and does not accumulate foreign reserves. It is both a trade account country and a capital account country. It seeks growth through its trade account and finance for its growth. It seeks investment through its capital account and foreign savings to finance domestic capital formation. The United States does not worry about its deteriorating international investment position. A second geographical area is Asia, comprising China, Taiwan, Japan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Korea, and Malaysia. Asia is a trade account region. Exporting to America is Asia's main concern. Exports mean growth. Their growth-oriented trade surpluses are a source of finance for the United States, channeled through their central banks as official providers of capital to the United States. The Asian countries manage their dollar exchange rates, and their central banks consistently intervene to limit appreciation of their currencies. Exchange controls and administrative pricing are often resorted to. Some currencies are explicitly fixed, like the Chinese yuan, the Hong Kong dollar, and the Malaysian ringit. The Japanese yen and Korean won float but Japan and Korea accumulate vast official reserves in U.S. dollars. The Asian country currencies float against the currencies of the third geographical area. The third geographical area comprises Europe, Canada, Australia, and Latin America. This is a capital account region. Private investors in the capital account region care about the risk/return of their international investment position, and have recently become worried about their U.S. exposure. Countries in the capital account region have floating exchange rates. Their governments do not intervene, and their official reserves have not increased. The trade-weighted exchange rate of the German mark and then the euro and other currencies of the capital account region depreciated substantially relative to the dollar from 1992 through 2002. The real exchange rate depreciation was consistent with private investors of the region helping to finance the U.S. current account deficit. Over the last five years, however, the U.S. current account deficit has been financed by official inflows from the trade account region as well as private inflows from the capital account region. The surge in the U.S. current account deficit has been the engine for growth in the rest of the world. Until early 2003, the tripartite global economy was stable and sustainable in view of the trade account region's preference for official investments in the United States and the capital account region's preference for private financial investments in the United States. Lately, however, the countries in the capital account region have become concerned about the rise in U.S. international debts. The depreciation of the euro and other capital account region currencies was reversed in 2003. Normally, the solution would be for U.S. yields to rise and the dollar to depreciate sharply. The dollar has depreciated, but may not persist, and U.S. yields may not rise. Instead, Asia may displace Europe in sending exports to the United States and may be ready to accept even larger inflows of U. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,010
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,033

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,003
Communication savante0,0080,006
Science ouverte0,0000,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0100,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,208
Écart entre enseignants0,198 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCato JournalMême sujetGlobal Financial Crisis and PoliciesTravaux en français237 207