MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W98619017

Target: The Challenge of Data Mining

2013· article· en· W98619017 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of critical incidents · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueCustomer churn and segmentation
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPurchasingClothingMarketingValue (mathematics)Product (mathematics)BusinessEarningsPortfolioTarget marketAdvertisingQuarter (Canadian coin)Computer scienceFinance
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Andrew Pole began working for Target as a statistician in 2002. His job was to improve effectiveness of Target's promotions by statistically analyzing information on customer purchasing patterns and demographic characteristics. The technique was often referred to as data mining. One of his tasks was predicting whether a woman was pregnant through her purchasing patterns and demographic profile. Marketing could then target these women with information on products for prenatal care and infant needs. All was going well until an irate father asked to see manager in a Target store outside of Minneapolis. Waiving a group of coupons for clothes and cribs that had been sent to his high school age daughter, father fumed, Are you trying to encourage her to get pregnant?(Hill, 2012). Was Target's utilization of customer data in this ethical, were mistakes more damaging than value of successes, and was this an invasion of privacy? These were questions that Target management had to resolve. Target From a single store in Roseville, MN, Target grew to over 1763 Target and Super Target stores by 2011. Target was second largest discount retailer in US and saw both sales and net earnings grow between 2006 and 2011. (Target, 2012). Target catered to a similar moneysaving market as Wal-Mart, but offered a very different value proposition. Target focused on different capabilities and a different product portfolio, including: * Target's way to emphasized design-forward apparel and home decor for image-conscious consumers. Store layout and advertising focused on an eye for style. * Its capabilities system supported this to play with image advertising, mass prestige sourcing (with use of private brand and exclusive offerings), pricing, and management of urban locations. * Target satisfied needs of its younger, image-conscious shoppers by stocking more furniture, clothing and exclusive designer merchandise than Wal-Mart. Gregg Steinhafel, Target's president, boasted to investors that heightened focus on items and categories that appeal to specific guest segments such as mom and baby (Target, 2012) were responsible for these successes. The segment focus relied heavily upon ability to determine customer purchasing patterns through prior purchase behaviors and other demographic data. Target was one of first major retailers to use predictive modeling (sophisticated data mining techniques) to identify customer segments and differentially market to those segments. Consumer Behavior: Why Does Data Mining Work It has long been a working assumption in psychology that one of tendencies of human behavior was habituation (Crossley, 2001). One of founding fathers of psychology, William James, described habit as sequences of behaviors, usually simple.... that have become virtually automatic (James, 1890). With automaticity at its core, habituation was ideal in creating repetition of useful behaviors that ultimately required less mental exertion or effort to maintain. In fact, James suggested the more of details of our daily life we can hand over to.... automatism, more our mind will be set free ... (p.122). Habits were acquired through gradual strengthening of a learned association between a situation (cue) and a routine action in a consistent context. In formation of a habit, control of behavior transfer to cues in environment. This transfer of behavioral control to environmental cues increase automaticity with which behavior was performed when situation was encountered again (Verplanken, 2006; Wood & Neal, 2007). From behavioral perspective, habit strength was considered to be a function of repetition only when rewards were received for performing behavior upon encountering a cue (Hull, 1943; 1951). Identifying three-part process (cue, routine, reward) of shopping habits of consumers allowed for retailers to market and exploit habitual purchasing behavior of its consumers, all seemingly without consumers' knowledge. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,352
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,003
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,084
Tête enseignante GPT0,335
Écart entre enseignants0,251 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle