Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Landscape Ecology - the Science or the Research Field? In the recent decades, the tendency promoting team research and interdisciplinary studies has been increasingly visible in natural sciences. More and more significant publications have been works by many authors representing different research orientations. At least to some extent, such a tendency can be seen as a response to growing specialisation and loss of connection not only between specialised scientific disciplines but also between subdisciplines of a given science or one system of sciences. Comprehensive studies of the natural systems are also stimulated by the increasing threat posed by adverse changes which take place in the natural world not only on the local and regional scale but above all in the global dimension. In view of the growing globalisation of social and economic processes, globalisation of threats to the natural environment is also more and more present in the debate. This in turn implies the need for extensive studies and discussions between specialists representing various research orientations. The term ‘landscape ecology’ was introduced by Carl Troll in the late 1930s. He proposed that the fundamental task of this discipline be the functional analysis of the landscape contents as well as explanation of its multiple and varying interrelations. Later Troll modified the definition of landscape ecology by referring toTansley’sconceptofecosystem.He wrote that landscape ecology is a science dealing with the system of interconnections between biocenoses and their environmental conditions in definitesegmentsoflandscape. Troll’s concepts however did not attract a lot of interest among the academic community. The heyday of landscape ecology came in the 1970s. In 1972 the Society for Landscape Ecology was established in the Netherlands. In 1981 the Society organised an international conference entitled “Prospects of Landscape Ecology”, held in Vendhoven. Initiated by Ružicka, a series of seminars on landscape and ecological issues was held in Slovakia (altogether 14 in the years 1967–2006). 1976 saw the first textbook, written by Leser and entitled Landschaftsőkologie . All these initiatives set the ground for establishing an international organisation, which was done in 1982, when, in the town of Pieŝt’any (Slovakia), the International Association for Landscape Ecology (IALE) came into being. The rapid development of integrated studies on the natural environment took place in the years following World War II and was undoubtedly influenced by the demand associated with economic practice. This development was particularly robust in the two German states and in Russia. Apart from European academic centres, comprehensive natural environment studies were also developing in Australia and later in Canada. Today, research in landscape ecology issues is conducted virtually in all countries of Europe and North America. In Poland, 1988 saw the establishment of the Ecological Club of the Polish Geographical Society which was the Polish branch of IALE, and in 1993 the Polish Association for Landscape Ecology (PAEK) was registered. There exist distinct differences in the way landscape ecology is understood in Europe and North America, which derive from both traditions and the nature of the research object. The development and popularity of landscape ecology is confirmed by many publications, which include – in addition to Leser’s textbook referred to above – the foundamental work by Naveh and Lieberman entitled: Landscape Ecology. Theory and Application . The periodical Landscape Ecology , indexed in the Philadelphia list, has been published since 1987. In the textbook authored by Richling and Solon (1994), we can find the statement that landscape ecology is a separate discipline of science, and its unique characteristic is that it approaches the object of research in a comprehensive and integral manner, and the object of research also involves man and results of human activity and is treated in the structural, functional and visual aspects. Today, such a tenet calls for a reformulation. More and more frequently, landscape ecology is treated as a research field which brings to get her specialists representing various scientific disciplines. The term “landscape ecology” incorporates various kinds of research which can also include components of landscape. What can be said about the future of landscape ecology? It will probably remain the research field which will bring together researchers with varied academic backgrounds and interests in the issues concerning natural systems and relationships between them and anthropogenic activity. This in turn may imply the risk that the term “landscape ecology” will vanish, which is even more likely because the present situation may stimulate the development of new directions in interdisciplinary studies. This is accompanied by a growing social demand for such problem solutions that can be applied in economic practice, as well as a good climate for regional studies
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».