MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W99729840 · doi:10.1182/blood.v122.21.3935.3935

Blockade Of CD47 Using SIRPαFc: Role Of The Fc Region In Anti-Leukemic Activity and Tolerability

2013· article· en· W99729840 sur OpenAlexaff
Robert A. Uger, Xinli Pang, Mark Wong, Violetta House, Karen Dodge, Stéphane Viau, Noel T. Vigo, Debbie Tam, Tran Truong, Liqing Jin, Andrei V. Malko, Jenny Ho, Tatiana K. Prasolava, Jayne S. Danska, Jean Wang, Penka S. Petrova

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineImmunology and Microbiology
ThématiquePhagocytosis and Immune Regulation
Établissements canadiensHospital for Sick ChildrenPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health NetworkTrillium Therapeutics (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCD47Fusion proteinEffectorCancer researchBiologyImmunologyBlockadeMyeloidAntibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicityPhagocytosisCell biologyAntibodyReceptorMonoclonal antibodyRecombinant DNABiochemistry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction CD47 binds to SIRPα on the surface of macrophages and delivers a “do not eat” signal that suppresses phagocytosis. There is increasing evidence that acute myeloid leukemia (AML) stem cells exploit the CD47-SIRPα pathway to escape macrophage-mediated destruction. Blockade of CD47 using a soluble SIRPα-Fc fusion protein (SIRPαFc) has emerged as a promising strategy to neutralize the suppressive effects of CD47 and promote the eradication of AML cells. However, little information is available regarding the optimal structure of SIRPαFc. In particular, the influence of the Fc region, which can mediate antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and complement activation, on anti-leukemic activity and toxicity has not been explored. Results We have generated three unique human SIRPαFc fusion proteins that vary in their Fc regions: SIRPα-G1, which contains the Fc region from human IgG1 with full effector activity; SIRPα-G4, bearing the Fc region from human IgG4, which has low effector activity; and SIRPα-G4m, which possesses a mutated human IgG4 Fc region that is devoid of any effector activity. These three fusion proteins were tested for their ability to promote macrophage-mediated phagocytosis of patient-derived AML cells in vitro. Although all three proteins were able to stimulate tumor cell destruction, SIRPα-G4m was clearly the least potent, while SIRPα-G1 and SIRPα-G4 showed similar activity. Next, the anti-leukemic activity of the fusion proteins was assessed in an AML xenograft model in NOD.SCID mice. SIRPα-G1 induced a profound anti-leukemic effect and was superior to both SIRPα-G4 and SIRPα-G4m, particularly with respect to eradicating tumor cells within the transplanted femur. Thus, while only a low level of Fc activity was required for maximal pro-phagocytic activity in vitro, full effector activity (human IgG1) provided superior anti-leukemic activity in vivo. The strong anti-tumor activity of this fusion protein presumably results from the simultaneous delivery of a positive macrophage activating signal (through Fc receptors) and blockade of the negative “do not eat” signal from CD47. Increased Fc effector activity could also carry the risk of increased toxicity. Since human SIRPα has no measurable binding to mouse CD47, to assess tolerability in mice we generated a surrogate fusion protein consisting of NOD mouse SIRPα linked to a mouse IgG2a Fc region with full effector function (mSIRPα-G2a). Repeat administration of high dose mSIRPα-G2a to mice (50 mg/kg IP twice per week for 8 weeks) produced no adverse clinical effects. No abnormalities were observed in hematological parameters, (including erythrocyte, platelet and leukocyte counts) or bone marrow CD150+CD48- LSK hematopoietic stem cells, nor were gross or microscopic changes noted in any tissue. Furthermore, taking advantage of a fortuitous cross-reactivity between NOD SIRPα and human CD47, we conducted a xenograft study with patient-derived AML cells using the mSIRPα-G2a fusion protein. Compared to control Fc, mSIRPα-G2a profoundly reduced leukemic burden in both the injected femur and non-injected bone marrow at doses significantly below the 50 mg/kg used in the tolerability studies. Thus, a mouse surrogate fusion that can bind both human CD47 on xenograft AML cells and endogenous CD47 on host tissue is both safe and effective. A pilot repeat-dose toxicity study using various human SIRPαFc proteins is currently underway in non-human primates. Conclusions These results demonstrate that SIRPαFc fusion proteins that combine Fc activity with CD47 blockade lead to effective AML destruction in vitro and in vivo, and are well tolerated in mice. Thus the therapeutic window in a homologous model system appears to be sufficiently wide to proceed with formal IND-enabling studies. On the basis of these findings we are moving forward with the development of a SIRPαFc therapeutic for the treatment of AML. Disclosures: Uger: Trillium Therapeutics/Stem Cell Therapeutics: Employment. Pang:Trillium Therapeutics/Stem Cell Therapeutics: Employment. Wong:Trillium Therapeutics/Stem Cell Therapeutics: Employment. House:Trillium Therapeutics/Stem Cell Therapeutics: Employment. Dodge:Trillium Therapeutics/Stem Cell Therapeutics: Employment. Viau:Trillium Therapeutics/Stem Cell Therapeutics: Employment. Vigo:Trillium Therapeutics/Stem Cell Therapeutics: Employment. Tam:Trillium Therapeutics/Stem Cell Therapeutics: Employment. Truong:Trillium Therapeutics/Stem Cell Therapeutics: Employment. Jin:Trillium Therapeutics/Stem Cell Therapeutics: Research Funding. Malko:Trillium Therapeutics/Stem Cell Therapeutics: Research Funding. Ho:Trillium Therapeutics/Stem Cell Therapeutics: Research Funding. Prasolava:Trillium Therapeutics/Stem Cell Therapeutics: Research Funding. Danska:Trillium Therapeutics/Stem Cell Therapeutics: Research Funding. Wang:Trillium Therapeutics/Stem Cell Therapeutics: Research Funding. Petrova:Trillium Therapeutics/Stem Cell Therapeutics: Employment.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,003

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,210
Écart entre enseignants0,198 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetPhagocytosis and Immune RegulationTravaux en français237 207