MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1004976766

编码荔枝乙烯受体(LcERSl)的cDNA基因的克隆与分析

2003· article· zh· W1004976766 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
韩继成, 方宣钧

Bibliographic record

Venue分子植物育种 · 2003
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGABA and Rice Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

利用RT—PCR和RACE方法获得了编码荔枝乙烯受体的cDNA序列,长度为2,193bp,该序列中包含一个ORF、全长1,848bp,编码615个氨基酸,推测的分子量为68kD。由该序列推定的蛋白质氨基末端存在疏水区。羧基端存在组氨酸激酶区和GAF区。与拟南芥的五个乙烯受体比较,推定的荔枝乙烯受体的激酶区有乙烯受体所具有的5个基序(H,N,G1,F,G2)中的H和N基序(motif),分别位于第423—432和532—543氨基酸。其保守序列H为:MNHEMRTPM;N为:LMQTILNIMGNA。结构分析和功能预测表明,本研究获得的荔枝乙烯受体编码序列推定的氨基酸序列具有乙烯受体的典型特征,初步分析表明获得的荔枝cDNA序列包含了编码荔枝乙烯受体,LcERSl,的全长cDNA基因(1cers1),GenBank登录号为AY311484。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue分子植物育种Same topicGABA and Rice ResearchFrench-language works237,207