MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1005176493 · doi:10.1161/str.44.suppl_1.atp442

Abstract TP442: Baseline Cognitive Impairment and Associated Risk Factors in Patients with Intracranial Stenosis in the SAMMPRIS Trial

2013· article· en· W1005176493 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Erin V Ilkanich, Alison Smock, George Cotsonis, Stephanie Helwig, Michael Lynn, Bethany F Lane, Jean Montgomery, Colin P. Derdeyn, David Fiorella, L. Scott Janis, Marc I. Chimowitz, Tanya N. Turan

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMontreal Cognitive AssessmentStroke (engine)Internal medicineCardiologyUnivariate analysisMultivariate analysisStenosisPhysical therapyCognitive impairmentDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Purpose: Cognitive impairment is an important outcome in stroke prevention trials. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score is a cognitive measure used in the Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) trial due to its sensitivity in detecting cognitive impairment in stroke patients. We sought to determine the prevalence of low baseline MoCA scores and the baseline risk factors associated with lower MoCA scores in SAMMPRIS patients. Methods: The main entrance criteria in SAMMPRIS were a TIA or non-disabling stroke within 30 days prior to enrollment attributed to 70-99% intracranial atherosclerosis. Patients with stroke as the qualifying event who had an NIH Stroke Score indicating aphasia or neglect were excluded from these analyses. Low MoCA score was defined as <26, the standard value that has 90% sensitivity for detecting mild cognitive impairment. Baseline demographic, medical history, laboratory, and neuroimaging characteristics were compared between patients with low vs. normal MoCA scores in univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: The prevalence of low baseline MoCA scores was 207/377 (55%). Baseline features associated with low MoCA scores in the univariate analyses are shown in Table 1. In the multivariate analyses, older age (p<0.0001) and physical inactivity (p=0.0166) were associated with low MoCA scores. MoCA score was not related to other vascular risk factors, severity of stenosis, prior stroke, or white matter lesions on CT or MRI. Conclusions: SAMMPRIS patients had a high prevalence of cognitive impairment at baseline, which was not explained by the presence of vascular risk factors, such as hypertension and hypercholesterolemia. This finding suggests that cognitive impairment may be an important source of potential disability in patients with intracranial stenosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases→French-language works237,207→