MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1006224874 · doi:10.1007/978-3-322-80483-9_13

Armutsbekämpfung in Entwicklungsländern und Einwanderungspolitik — Zwei Seiten derselben Medaille?

2003· book-chapter· de· W1006224874 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dagmar Eichert

Bibliographic record

VenueVS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks · 2003
Typebook-chapter
Languagede
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Development and Aid
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In den 1950er Jahren begann Kanada mit seinen ersten Entwicklungshilfeinitiativen. Die kanadische Entwicklungshilfe (Canadian Official Development Assistance, ODA) spielte neben Kanadas Rolle bei Peacekeeping-Missionen eine bedeutende Rolle in der Außendarstellung Kanadas als eines der großzügigen und gestaltenden Akteure auf der internationalen Bühne. Um den kanadischen Bemühungen um Entwicklungshilfe ein größeres Gewicht zu verleihen und diese fest in die Administration zu verankern, wurde unter Premierminister Trudeau die Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) gegründet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.153

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.007
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooksSame topicInternational Development and AidFrench-language works237,207