MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1007090632 · doi:10.58079/oxk7

Appel de Communications, Berkshire Conference on Women's History: Histories on the Edge/Histoires sur la brèche

2012· article· en· W1007090632 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Katie Jarvis

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesHistoryArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

APPEL A COMMUNICATIONS «Berkshire Conference on Women’s History» Histories on the Edge/Histoires sur la brèche Toronto: du 22 au 25 mai 2014 Envoi des propositions: avant le 15 janvier 2013 http://berksconference.org/meetings/reminder-and-submission-site-for-2014-big-berks-is-up-and-running/ Cliquez ici pour accéder au Site des soumissions! La description du site: La seizième «Berkshire Conference on Women’s History» se tiendra à Toronto du 22 au 25 mai 2014. L’Université de Toronto accue...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.488
Threshold uncertainty score0.971

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0080.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3630.095

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207