Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Critical discourse addressing the question of ‘migrant writing’ has most often privileged phenomena related exclusively to movement, whence the tendency to characterize the intercultural subject in relation to concepts such as exile, deterritorialization and dispossession. This article, centred on the most recent novels of two Asian francophone writers, Ying Chen and Kim Thúy, seeks to broach the subject from another angle. The author postulates that the coexistence of prose and poetic expression in a same text produces a tension that may be interpreted as the attempt to portray the migrant figure as an emplaced mobile subject. The study’s theoretical bases are grounded in the notions or concepts of sensual imagination and translocality. La perspective communément adoptée pour penser la question identitaire chez les écrivains migrants privilégie les phénomènes liés exclusivement à la mouvance, ce qui explique la tendance à parler du sujet interculturel en rapport avec des concepts tels que l’exil, la déterritorialisation et la dépossession. Cet article adopte une autre approche en s’intéressant au traitement de la question chez deux écrivaines asiatico-francophones, Ying Chen et Kim Thúy. L’auteure postule que la coexistence de la prose et de l’expression poétique chez ces écrivaines produit une tension, expression de la tentative de parler à la fois de mouvance et d’ancrage dans un ‘chez-soi’. La base théorique de son étude emprunte à l’anthropologie son intérêt pour l’imagination sensuelle et à la géographie, le concept de la translocalité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".