Abstract 5381: Insulin-Stimulated Glucose Oxidation is Increased in Hearts from High Fat Diet-Induced Obese Mice Lacking Malonyl CoA Decarboxylase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE - Diet-induced obesity (DIO) leads to an accumulation of intra-myocardial fatty acid metabolites that have been proposed to cause myocardial insulin resistance and dysfunction. Our goal was to determine the effect of DIO on myocardial fatty acid metabolite accumulation and how this is altered when mitochondrial fatty acid uptake is inhibited. This was achieved by using mice lacking malonyl CoA decarboxylase (MCD−/−), which have higher levels of malonyl CoA, an endogenous inhibitor of mitochondrial fatty acid uptake. METHODS - Wild type (WT) and MCD−/− mice were fed a low (4% kcal from lard) or high (60% kcal from lard) fat diet for 12 weeks to determine the effect of DIO on the intra-myocardial accumulation of long chain acylcarnitines, long chain acyl CoAs, triglycerides (TGs), and ceramides. A parallel feeding study was performed to assess myocardial function and energy metabolism in isolated working hearts in the absence/presence of insulin. RESULTS - We demonstrate that MCD−/− mice do not accumulate intramyocardial long chain acylcarnitines to the same extent as WT mice following DIO (0.56 ± 0.10 vs. 0.28 ± 0.07 pmol myristoylcarnitine/mg protein, P <0.05), but do accumulate similar amounts of long chain acyl CoAs (3.88 ± 0.34 vs. 4.35 ± 1.19 nmol/g wet weight). Interestingly, DIO only lead to an accumulation of TGs in the hearts of MCD−/− mice (3.29 ± 0.62 vs. 10.92 ± 3.72 μmol/g wet weight, P <0.05). Despite this elevation in TGs, MCD−/− mice showed increased insulin-stimulated glucose oxidation (2.46 ± 0.25 vs. 1.74 ± 0.18 fold increase, P <0.05) during aerobic isolated working heart perfusions and did not elicit any dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS - Our data reveal discordance between myocardial TG accumulation and glucose metabolism, suggesting that TG buffers against toxic lipids, and that inhibition of mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation does not cause myocardial dysfunction following DIO.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".