MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1009838672

与《合金装备》异曲同工的大作——《分裂细胞》玩后感

2003· article· zh· W1009838672 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
boyinsky

Bibliographic record

Venue电脑采购 · 2003
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Development and Environment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

早在年初的E3大展中,《分裂细胞》就获得了官方颁发的“最佳动作/冒险游戏”奖项。这部由UbiSoft的Montreal工作室负责开发的游戏在欧美号称全面超越了《合金装备2》,看来我们没有理由不来关注一下这款XBOX/PC双平台的游戏大作了。喜欢《合金装备》类型游戏的玩家们一定在期盼它的到来吧?我虽然盼望了很久,但是直到最近才有时间玩,现在写攻略但是如果你想将《分裂细胞》和《合金装备》作一个谁优谁劣的比较,我觉得你大可不必这样,因为这两款脍炙人口的大作是隶属两种不同的风格,他的形成也是由两种不同的文化背景和主流思想所孕育的,大家不必为此争得面红耳赤,凡游戏必有优点和不足,以已之长比他人之短并不是个让人信服的举措!

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.008
Scholarly communication0.0150.014
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue电脑采购Same topicRegional Development and EnvironmentFrench-language works237,207