MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W101077439

Mesoscale vortices, ageostrophic motions and vertical mixing in the ocean

2010· article· en· W101077439 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Annalisa Bracco, Inga Monika Koszalka, Yuley Cardona, Hao Luo

Bibliographic record

VenueEGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMesoscale meteorologyGeologyVortexRossby waveAnticycloneClimatologyForcing (mathematics)EddyVorticityInertial waveOcean currentAtmospheric sciencesGeophysicsMeteorologyPhysicsTurbulenceWave propagation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate the role played by wind-forced eddies in the vertical transport and mixing at the ocean mesoscale with a high-resolution primitive-equation model. Both idealized and realistic configurations are implemented. With a detailed analysis of the vertical velocity field in the idealized experiments we find that in the vortex cores and inside intense vorticity filaments, the motion is strongly ageostrophic, and vertical velocities associated with the vortices can reach magnitudes and levels of spatial complexity akin to those reported for frontal regions. Mesoscale anticyclones appear as ”islands” of increased penetration of wind energy into the ocean interior, and they represent the maxima of available potential energy. The wind energy injected at the surface is transferred at depth through the generation and subsequent straining effect of Vortex Rossby Waves (VRWs), whose time-scale is of the order of few days, and through near-inertial internal oscillations trapped inside anticyclonic vortices, on time scales of few hours to few days depending on the latitude. In the realistic configurations (Labrador Sea and South China Sea), we show that the temporal resolution of the wind forcing contributes to the strength of the near-inertial component. We evaluate the response of the ocean circulation in the under three different forcing conditions: NCEP/QUICKSCATT blended monthly, daily and six-hourly mean winds. While the surface circulation does not display significant differences, the vertical velocity field shows high sensitivity to the frequency of the wind forcing. We analyze the physical mechanism responsible for those changes and the details of the interplay between the near-inertial and mesoscale eddy fields under the various forcing fields, quantifying the impact of those changes on the vertical mixing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.461

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEGU General Assembly Conference AbstractsSame topicOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFrench-language works237,207