Laboratorio Urbano -- Lámina 5. Viaje a Lavapiés (02): La Tabacalera
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A national study of Canadian hospitals assessed the perceived level and types of competition and the strategies pursued by these hospitals. Questionnaire data were obtained from chief executive officers in 715 hospitals, yielding a national response rate of 68%. Respondents indicated the perceived level of competition in the environment, the content of competition, and stated hospital strategies. Additional data were obtained on market share and hospital type. Close to half of the respondents indicated little or no competition in their environment, while 30% indicated substantial levels of competition. This represents a significant deviation from conventional wisdom about the Canadian health services environment. Respondents in hospitals with more than 75% of the market share were less likely to perceive competition than those with a smaller market share. CEOs in teaching hospitals and in hospitals located in larger communities reported higher levels of competition. Hospitals competed mostly for capital, programs, and staff; about a third of hospitals competed for patients and no differences were found by type of institution. Those hospitals in more competitive environments were more likely to indicate the use of diversification and horizontal integration as organizational strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it